March Madness 2011 Predictions: Could Marquette Upset Xavier?
At 7:27 PM ET tonight, the Marquette Golden Eagles look to upset the Xavier Musketeers.
Every season, one of the main draws to March Madness is filling out brackets and trying to pick upsets.
Yesterday, we saw one of the best upsets in recent history when Morehead State took down No. 4 seed Louisville.
Tonight's game could feature another early upset.
Marquette enters the game as a No. 11 seed with a 20-14 overall record. Xavier comes in as a No. 6 seed with a 24-7 overall record.
However, I'm not convinced that Xavier is the better team.
Xavier's primary weapon is Atlantic 10 player of the year Tu Holloway. Holloway averages 20.2 points per game on 43 percent field goal shooting.
If Marquette can limit the damage that Holloway does, it has a legitimate shot at coming away with an upset.
Marquette's bench should have no problem outperforming Xavier's, which has struggled all season.
Marquette also appears to be better in almost every statistical category heading into the game.
The Golden Eagles average more points per game and have recorded a better seasonal field goal percentage. They average more rebounds per game and more assists.
Who Will Win?
Marquette does allow more points against, but it has also faced much tougher competition all season.
Marquette plays in the Big East, which is undoubtedly the toughest conference in the NCAA.
Nine of Marquette's 14 losses came against opponents that were ranked at the time. It came within five points of upsetting Duke early in the season.
Xavier played only one ranked opponent all season. It faced No. 25 Cincinnati only to get decimated 66-46.
According to teamrankings.com, Marquette had the 12th-most difficult schedule, while Xavier's schedule ranked 65th.
This game should be one of the more exciting ones the first round has to offer. Tune in later tonight to see if Marquette can pull off the upset.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?