The Rise, and Fall of the Tampa-2 Defense As We Know It

History: The Tampa-2 defense has it's origins from "The Steel Curtain" days of the Steelers from the 1970's. In fact Tony Dungy was quoted saying "My philosophy is out of the 1975 Pittsburgh Steelers' playbook." In reality it came from head coach Chuck Knoll and defensive coordinator Bud Carson. I think one only has to look at all of the Steelers' Super Bowl wins during this period to see how effective it was. Carson was the one who introduced the idea of moving the middle linebacker into coverage, which became extremely effective with the addition of the very talented LB Jack Lambert.

No doubt Tony, who was assitant head coach, and the defensive coordinator for the Steelers at the time, seeing the success Bill Walsh was having in the '80s with the West Coast Offense, was working on ideas of how to beat it.

By the time Tony was named head coach in Tampa Bay in 1996, with defensive coordinator Monte Kiffin, he had come up with a plan to shut down the West Coast Offense. Make no mistake this is what the Tampa-2 is designed to do. The reason the Tampa-2 is so effective against the West Coast Offense is because the West Coast Offense eschews a running game for short passes, where the receiver is expected to get yards after the catch or Y.A.C.'s.

Don't confuse the West Coast Offense with the Run and Shoot offense where there is no running game. There is still a a running game in the purest form of the West Coast Offense but it's not the main focal point. So then why is the Tampa-2 so effective against the the West Coast Offense?

Why the Tampa-2 Works: The biggest tweak that Tony made to the Cover-2 zone defense is at the Mike linebacker position. In a typical Cover-2 system a linebacker is usually expected to play a hook zone over the middle or come up for run support. In the Tampa-2 the Mike is expected to cover the deep middle of the field. Basically this turns a Cover-2 into a Cover-3 except you're doing it with a LB instead of a DB. This corrects a flaw in the standard Cover-2 which is once you get past 10-15 yards there is a soft spot in the zone over the middle which a quarterback can exploit for a nice gain. By having the Mike drop back so far you cut off that opening. The Mike and the front four are integral to this system being effective. The Mike has to be quick in his read of run or pass. If it's run he's expected to come up and help in run support, if it's pass then he has to drop back fast.

The defensive lineman are expected to get off their blocks, penetrate their gaps, and either sack the quarterback or cause him to throw the ball before he wants to. This usually leads to all sorts of nasty things like interceptions, fumbles, or sacks for big losses.

The Tampa-2 is all about speedy, undersized players who can hit hard and tackle. It also relies on gang tackling and keeping everything in front of the DB's and LB's. The principal is that sure, we'll let you have the short stuff, but then we are going to hit you hard and take you down. You are going to have to work for every yard you gain because we aren't going to give up the big play. We are going to have a fast undersized DL that is going to pressure the quarterback, and we figure you are going to make a mistake on your long trip down the field.

The job of the cornerbacks is to jam the WRs at the line of scrimage, to prevent an outside release by the wideouts. This funnels all vertical routes to the safeties. Allowing an outside release in the Tampa-2 is a big no-no because it forces the safeties to cover a greater distance from their landmarks, plus it puts more pressure on the Mike backer versus vertical inside routes. If you think about this for a second it makes sense. If the safeties are forced to stretch out farther towards the side lines then the Mike has less help on the vertical routes in the middle.

Once the corners have caused an inside release, they drop back about 12 yards, which forces all the throws to go to the flats where they can run up and make a tackle for a minimal gain.

Remember in a zone scheme all the DB's are watching the quarterback vs. man coverage where the CB is running with the wideout. The corners know they have help over the top if the QB decides to throw to the outside receiver. This allows them to take a chance on intercepting the ball because they know the safety is over the top to cover the wideout. So against a zone scheme you tend to see more underneath throws where the DBs will then run up and make a tackle for a marginal gain.