Credit Batum for keeping things basic. It'll certainly help the Blazers to play with more of an edge, and the perfect focus necessary to compete with San Antonio might come from anger. But let's remember something important here: The Spurs do not understand human emotion, and they do not respond to it.
Spurs Machine engaged. Repeat: Spurs Machine engaged. Take cover, pray to the good Lord Popovich.— Zach Lowe (@ZachLowe_NBA) May 7, 2014
San Antonio clubbed the Blazers in Game 1, coasting to a 116-92 win that wasn't as close as the final score indicated. On the strength of brilliant schemes that attacked Damian Lillard and a refusal to double LaMarcus Aldridge, the Spurs completely dictated the terms of engagement against the inexperienced Blazers.
In the aftermath, Lillard could only marvel at the ruthless efficiency of his opponent.
#Blazers' Damian Lillard on the Spurs' play in Game 1: "That's a championship team."— Joe Freeman (@BlazerFreeman) May 7, 2014
It's good that Lillard acknowledges the reality of this series. Beating San Antonio is a herculean task—especially now that it appears that the Spurs have hit their stride, following a difficult series against the Dallas Mavericks.
Some folks, though, need a little reminder about how the Spurs conduct business in the playoffs.
Getting mad might help, but there's also a chance it'll backfire on Portland. San Antonio feasts on mistakes, and it makes fools of the overly aggressive by executing with cold impassivity.
You get upset. The Spurs get surgical.
Emotion can be a great motivator, but maybe the Blazers should focus more intently on hiding Lillard defensively. And perhaps a few tweaks to get open shots for role players like Batum and Wesley Matthews would be helpful. In Game 1, that duo combined to shoot just 5-of-18 from the field.
Portland won't get far if the threes don't start falling, either. If San Antonio holds the Blazers to just four made triples again, the Blazers will really have something to get mad about.
Because they'll be staring at the wrong end of an 0-2 deficit.