What Else Did Miguel Tejada Lie About? Is Rafael Palmeiro Clean?

Houston Astros shortstop, Miguel Tejada appeared before a federal judge this morning to plead guilty to charges of lying to Congress about his knowledge of, and involvement with, Performance Enhancing Drugs in Major League Baseball.

According to court documents, Tejada has entered into a plea agreement with prosecutors allowing him to testify today. He is charged with lying to investigators for the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in 2005 about conversations he had with, and about, former Oakland A's teammate Adam Piatt, and Piatt's PED use.

It's important to note that, at this point, Tejada isn't being charged with lying about his own PED use, though terms of his plea agreement may include further information.

Tejada faces as much as one year in jail if convicted of the misdemeanor charge of making misrepresentations to Congress. Under federal guidelines, he would probably receive a lighter sentence.

Tejada has also lied about his age, as ESPN confronted him about discrepancies in his birth certificate.

Tejada was originally called upon by the investigators after former teammate Rafael Palmeiro indicated that a tainted B-12 injection, given to him by Tejada, may have caused Pameiro to test positive for steroids. Palmeiro, earlier that year, testified before Congress that he had never used steroids.

During Palmeiro's appeal process Congress also investigated the former first baseman on perjury charges, but after their investigation no charges were filed against Palmeiro.

So let's go through the list: Barry Bonds is accused of lying to a federal grand jury—he was charged with perjury. Roger Clemens is accused of lying to Congress—he could very likely be charged with perjury. Miguel Tejada lied to Congress and is pleading guilty to the charges.

But Rafael Palmeiro was accused of lying to Congress, was investigated, and Congress found no evidence to charge him of perjury.

"We couldn't find any evidence of steroid use prior to his testimony," Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., said when he released a 44-page report. "That's not a finding of innocence, but it's a finding that we could not substantiate perjury."

"We have a responsibility, an obligation, to investigate it, and that's what we've done."

During the investigation, two other Orioles, identified in the report as Player A and Player B, were also given B-12 by Tejada. "The committee did find substantial inconsistencies between Mr. Tejada's account and the accounts of Players A and B," Davis said. "While these inconsistencies were curious to us, we did not pursue them."

Evidence shows that if you lie to Congress, or a grand jury, about steroids usage you will be charged and prosecuted for perjury; yet, Congress failed to charge Rafael Palmeiro. Congress had Palmeiro's drug tests, they had inconsistencies in Tejada's testimony, and they interviewed a dozen other people involved.

Why, then, didn't they prosecute Palmeiro, like they have prosecuted Bonds, Tejada, and Clemens? They believed him.

Why doesn't anyone else? Why is it so hard to believe that in April of 2005, Tejada gave Palmeiro a syringe of what Tejada claimed was vitamin B-12, and it turns out there were mere traces of stanozolol in the mix?

On May 19, 2005, MLB informed Palmeiro that he failed a PED test he took on May 4. On May 27, Palmeiro took a second test and was clean. In the span of three weeks, there was so little banned substance in his system that he tested clean.

So why is it so hard to believe Palmeiro? Congress did.