Jeter, Jeter, Numbers Beater: Why Derek's 2010 Stats Make No Sense
Thereâs something quite odd about Derek Jeter.
I donât mean the fact that heâs seemingly ageless, or that heâs actually a somewhat-likeable guy despite being the captain of the most evil group of players ever to walk onto a baseball field.
I am referring to the fact that the numbers Jeter has accrued so far this season simply donât make any sense.
TOP NEWS

MLB Manager Hot-Seat Check đĨ

Predicting Every Team's Opening Day Lineup đŽ

New Top 100 Prospects Rankings đ
In the interest of full disclosure, I havenât seen Jeter play very much this year. As a Red Sox fan from Cleveland, I donât get many opportunities to see the Yankees, and I donât particularly care about them unless theyâre losing.
Looking at his statistics, though, itâs clear that something really weird is going on.
For starters, Jeter has suddenly become a power hitter. Heâs on pace for 26 home runsâheâs never hit more than 24 in a seasonâand 130 RBI (heâs reached triple-digits only once in his career). His ISO (.176, compared to his .142 career mark) is his best since 2004, and heâs slugging over .500 for the first time this millennium.
The obvious explanation for this would be that Jeter is hitting more fly balls, and that the supposedly unforeseen wind patterns at Yankee Stadium (come on, does anyone really think that was an accident?) are assisting his power surge. Youâd be half-right; all of his homers so far have come at home, where he holds a comically and unsustainably inflated 58.6 percent HR/FB rate.
But the fly ball thing? Totally wrong. While almost half (44 percent) of Jeterâs hits have been in the air over his career, just 29 percent of his batted balls in 2010 have been fly balls or line drives. His 71 percent ground-ball rate is by far the highest in the majors; no one else with a GB rate over 60 percent has more than two homers. So basically, Jeter doesnât hit fly balls except when they turn into home runs.
Confused yet? It gets weirder.
Never a terribly patient hitter to begin with (9.0 percent career BB rate), Jeter has taken just five free passes so far for a miserable walk rate of 4.6 percent.
The reason for this is obvious: Heâs swinging at garbage. Jeter has chased less than 20 percent of pitches out of the zone since tracking began in 2002. This year, heâs swinging at roughly a third (33 percent) of what would otherwise be called balls.
In other words, heâs about 60 percent more likely to take a hack at a bad pitch than he normally is. Thatâs roughly the difference between Kevin âGreek God of Walksâ Youkilis and Yuniesky âWorst Player in Baseballâ Betancourt.
Youâd think that such a change would have an inflationary effect on his strikeout numbers, right?
Wrong. Just like his walk rate, his strikeout rate (8.8 percent) is by far the lowest of his career and just over half his overall mark (16.8 percent).
How is this possible? Despite the fact that Jeter is swinging at more bad pitches than ever, heâs making contact at the best rate (88.4 percent) of his career.
You read that correctlyâhe's putting the bat on more balls than ever in spite of (or maybe, somehow, because of) the collapse of his plate discipline.
Does your brain hurt? Donât be alarmed; that indicates only that you are still sane.
Letâs recap: at age 35, Jeter has found his power stroke while simultaneously hitting more grounders than Major Leagueâs Willie Mays Hayes. Meanwhile, his plate discipline has gone down the toilet, but heâs making the best contact of his career.
I hope someone who has watched Jeter more than I have would be able to provide some answers. But from here, it seems that something is rotten in the state of New York.
Note: This was an attempt at an objective statistical analysis, not an incendiary piece of propaganda meant to rile up Yankees fans, as some have suggested. The inclusions of my personal sentiment were facetious. If you choose not to believe me, there's nothing more I can do for you, and I'm not going to waste any more of my time responding to these unfounded allegations.




.png?w=2560)


.jpg?w=2560)

.png?w=2560)

