Is It Too Early To Give Roy Halladay the NL Cy Young Award?
When you think of top pitchers in the game, names like C.C. Sabathia, Tim Lincecum, Zack Greinke, Felix Hernandez, and Johan Santana come up.
However, after what we've seen from Halladay in the first four games of the 2010 season, is it too early to give him the NL Cy Young Award?
The first reason is simply looking at Halladay's statistics through the first four games of the season. Sure, you can't expect him to keep up this pace through the rest of the season, but his numbers simply speak for themselves over the course of his career.
This year, he has a 4-0 record, has recorded 28 strikeouts, walked three batters, and given up three earned runs, and has a measly 0.82 ERA.
Now, there are those who will say, "The Phillies haven't played anyone to start the season."
The second reason why Halladay should just go ahead and be named the NL Cy Young is the video evidence. Just look at the way he carries himself during every pitch. Whether he's down 3-0 in the count or is up 0-2, Halladay always feels like he can get the out. There's no nervousness or stress coming from the mound. He goes out there and simply does what he's done for the last 12 years.
The final reason to go ahead and give Halladay the award is because the Phillies have, without a doubt, the best offense in the National League. That alone will allow Halladay to be successful on the mound.
Each night out, the Phillies will give their ace a chance to pitch with a lead. When you give an ace like Halladay a lead with which to pitch, he's going to be very hard to beat.
Now, will Halladay be named the Cy Young winner at the end of the year?
Only time will tell.
But if the season continues to go the way it has, then you could likely see the first 25-game winner since Bob Welch did it in 1990. That alone should win Halladay the NL Cy Young award, if nothing else.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?