(Photo by George Rose/Getty Images)
Thanks to the Buffalo Bills, the no-huddle offense is in the limelight again.
Two months ago, ESPN and several other outlets reported that new Bills offensive coordinator Turk Schonert was busy installing his version of the no-huddle for the upcoming 2009 season.
The announcement came at the perfect time because unbeknownst to many, the high-flying no-huddle offense will be celebrating it's 25th birthday this year.
It all started on December 29, 1983, when the Cincinnati Bengals announced the hiring of a new head coach, Sam Wyche.
Midway through the 1984 season, his first in Cincinnati, "Wicky Wacky" Wyche (as the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette called him) had a revelation as he watched his team prepare for a third down and long situation. The coach couldn't understand why anyone with half a brain would let the defense sub out slow linebackers for speedy nickel backs.
"We're going to go back here and [huddle] for 20 seconds and let them get all of their best rushers and best cover people in?" Wyche posited in a November 2008 interview with the Roanoke Times. "And [then] we're going to line-up and do exactly what they thought we'd do—throw the ball."
Wyche knew there had to be a better way. So the mad scientist in him began experimenting.
First, the Bengals started running a basketball type huddle from the sideline. During timeouts, 15-20 players would huddle around Wyche listening for the next play. As soon as the referees whistled the ball in-play, 11 players sprinted to the line of scrimmage.
This strategy made sure the defense didn't have time to match up with the Bengals personnel on the field.
It wasn't long before the No Fun League put a hamper on the Bengals brilliance by limiting the tactic.
Next up, the team developed what was known as the "sugar huddle," it was given this mouthwatering moniker because it was supposed to be "short and sweet."
At the time, most teams were spending about 20 seconds in the huddle, the Bengals cut that down to five. The short-lived sugar huddle proved to be to the forefather to the now-famous no-huddle.
The no-huddle, like most great inventions, was born out of necessity. Wyche needed an offense that the NFL wouldn't punish, "They changed [the rules] every week for almost four years," Wyche says of the NFL. "Every week they had a different rule, I'm not exaggerating, it was so frustrating."
In 1986, Wyche brought Bruce Coslet to Cincinnati to coordinate the Bengals offense. With Coslet's help, Wyche was going to turn the no-huddle into something of legend.
One of the main reasons Wyche brought in Coslet is because they were both disciples of Bill Walsh. Both had been around for the advent of the "Cincinnati Offense" (Later dubbed the West Coast) and both had creative minds when it came to exploring the nuances of what you can and can't do with an NFL offense.
Boomer Esiason, who would benefit from the no-huddle's success as the Bengals quarterback, said on America's Game: The Missing Rings, that he saw the roots of Coslet's and Wyche's brilliance, "We took Bill Walsh's 49ers West Coast [offense], very cerebral system, to another level of thinking, it was remarkable."
As the Bengals headed to Pittsburgh for week six of the 1986 season, talk of the no-huddle hit a fever pitch. The Bengals went into the Monday Night showdown at 3-2, but in those three wins, they had scored a remarkable 36, 30, and 34 points.
"We've had more success with it then people realize," Wyche said in an interview with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette before the game. Many outside observers however, claimed that the offense seemed to confuse the Bengals more then the opposing defenses, but Wyche would have none of that talk.
"We actually know what we're doing," Wyche said at the time. "Sometimes we use it to keep personnel off the field, sometimes to change the tempo of the game, and sometimes to force defenses out of a certain coverage."
He also mentioned a few more reasons why he likes it, "It's a different wrinkle, it's something we give people that they don't see every week and it's difficult to practice against."
Although the Bengals would win the week six battle with the hated Steelers, they would fall just short of the playoffs, finishing the season 10-6.
After the team's first 10-win season in five years, Wyche and Coslet both felt they had a potential success on their hands with the no-huddle.
However, since the team was only employing the offense for less then 50 percent of their plays, most coaches were convinced that it wasn't the no-huddle that was causing the Bengals success. Ere-go, no one copied it.





We're going to send you the most entertaining Cincinnati Bengals articles, videos, and podcasts from around the web.










8 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete