Is Brandon Weeden the Cleveland Browns' Best Option for Replacing Brian Hoyer?
#Browns Chud: MRI for Hoyer shows torn ACL, will require surgery. No other damage. Out for season.— Scott Petrak ct (@ScottPetrak) October 4, 2013
After a disappointing rookie season, Weeden was uninspiring in his two 2013 starts before injuring his thumb—a development which led to Hoyer taking over the No. 1 job.
As Hoyer's replacement against Buffalo, the 2012 first-round pick completed 13-of-24 passes for 197 yards and a touchdown with no interceptions.
With 11 more regular-season games to go, is Weeden the Browns' best option under center?
Let's explore the possibilities.
Jason Campbell was inactive for Cleveland's game against Buffalo on Thursday Night Football, but he's healthy.
When Weeden was injured, the Browns coaching staff simply chose No. 3 signal-caller Hoyer over the eight-year veteran.
He does have a strong arm, which is likely part of the reason why the Browns signed him, as they have a variety of vertical routes in their offense.
However, like Weeden, he has somewhat of an elongated delivery and the tendency to hold on to the football too long in the pocket.
Campbell is very comparable to Weeden in many ways—it'd be a coin flip as to whether he'd be an upgrade. However, the soon-to-be 32-year-old has no upside and is not the future of the franchise.
Therefore, Weeden would get the nod.
Josh Freeman is far and away the best available free-agent quarterback. The 25-year-old was run out of Tampa Bay due to inconsistent play and a sour relationship with head coach Greg Schiano.
At his age, with a rather large 6'6", 240-pound frame and an impressive set of physical skills, there's plenty to like about Freeman's upside.
But he struggled with accuracy for most of his time as the Buccaneers starter and was carrying a 45.7 completion percentage before being benched following Tampa Bay's Week 3 loss to the New England Patriots.
Either way, NFL.com's Ian Rapoport reports that the Browns are not interested in the 2009 first-round pick:
Just because that news surfaced doesn't mean there's absolutely no chance Cleveland will make a run at Freeman, but it seems very unlikely to happen.
Would he be an upgrade over Weeden?
Due to his NFL experience and athleticism, he would be.
Don't be surprised if the Browns simply add another backup-level quarterback to play behind Weeden for the remainder of the season.
There aren't any starting-caliber free agents on the market who'd be better than Weeden.
Though Weeden has been a general disappointment in Cleveland, his arm strength and time spent learning Rob Chudzinski's offense make him a much more viable candidate than a midseason pickup.
Weeden isn't nearly as decisive as Hoyer and hasn't been as accurate, but he hasn't been dreadful in 2013. His Pro Football Focus (subscription required) QB rating of 85.02 ranks 18th out of 34 quarterbacks, just .18 below Tom Brady.
Also, take a look at his statistics on passes thrown at least 20 yards down the field:
Pro Football Focus
In Chudzinski's offense, with Josh Gordon back from suspension, that's important.
Brandon Weeden may not be the most glamorous replacement for the injured Hoyer, but he's the best option for the Cleveland Browns.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?