Shabazz Muhammad Traded to Minnesota Timberwolves: Scouting Report and Analysis
Here's how Bleacher Report NBA Draft Lead Writer Jonathan Wasserman breaks down Muhammad's physical attributes:
Muhammad measured just over 6'6'' in shoes at the combine, a number that has some scouts worried. The small forward position is evolving, with bigger and more athletic wings like Paul George setting the bar.
He did measure a 6'11'' wingspan, a big-time number for a 2 or 3. Despite a top-heavy body, Muhammad is light on his feet and moves extremely well around the court. He has the foot speed to face up or make sharp cuts off the ball.
He's not the most explosive athlete in the world, but he's got a relentless motor that helps maximize his physical tools. Muhammad's combination of power and finesse also makes him a scoring threat from every spot on the floor.
Getting to Know Shabazz Muhammad
Muhammad was worshiped coming out of high school, so the downward draft stock throughout his freshman year was a humbling experience for him. He's conscious of his deficiencies, and you can tell he wants to prove that he can indeed be a star.
NBA Player Comparison
If he improves his physique, ball-handling and step-back jumper, Muhammad could be quite like All-Star James Harden.
His basement is C.J. Miles. Jonathan Wasserman explains that Miles is an athletic shooter but is "limited with the ball in his hands, which has had him in a complementary role for the first portion of his career."
Until he can improve his right-hand dribble and mid-drive decision-making, there's a limit to Muhammad's production as a young shooting guard or small forward.
Fortunately, he possesses the length and slashing ability to keep defenses on their heels, along with an above-average knack for perimeter scoring.
His role in the NBA will be largely dependent on his willingness to polish his right hand and become a more potent lateral shot-creator.
If he does this, and sculpts an ideal wing body, he'll thrive and make several teams regret not picking him.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?