Indian Cricket: What Sanjay Dixit Said, Really Meant and Definitely Did Not
What he said:
“I did not know whether I was looking at a draft legislation or an operations manual of a sports association.”
“Here we had a compendium which seemed to address every micro detail.”
“I learned that an argument had been advanced that since certain associations got free land, they were amenable to government control. Taking this logic further, almost every hospital, educational institution, most industries and many NGOs should also come under government control and RTI. In legal parlance, it is called perverse logic.”
What he really meant:
“It’s about control, more aptly put a tussle for control. The government wants IN, the sports bodies want (the government) OUT.”
“Autocracy is all right—as long as I’m the one ruling the roost.”
What he definitely didn’t:
“It’s an open door policy for sportsmen administrators. Don’t even bother to knock.”
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?