NBA Draft: Toronto Raptors Steal Jonas Valanciunas with the 5th Pick
Oh great, another Euro. Toronto Raptors fans all over the country are hot blooded over the Raptors' lottery selection of the Lithuanian center Jonas Valanciunas.
Let me get one thing across. Jonas is not your typical European.
He’s 7’0", but he is definitely not soft. Jonas isn’t a great shooter, but he is extremely active on the boards and can block tons of shots. He’s a high energy defender and attacks the rim hard offensively.
Put it this way, he’s NOT Andrea Bargnani.
Jonas could very well end up filling one of the Raps' biggest holes at the center position. He brings added toughness to the team and is already the best center on the team. Down the road, Jonas Valanciunas could be the Toronto Raptors franchise center.
An issue with Jonas is his buyout issues. He’s currently under contract with a Lithuanian club, and if he cannot negotiate a buyout, he will not be able to play for the Raptors untill the 2012-2013 season (the season after next season).
Considering there could be a possible lockout anyway, this isn’t a huge issue, especially with the Raptors still in rebuilding mode.
Jonas was expected to go No. 4 to the Cleveland Cavaliers, and many scouts have said that he could end up being the best player out of this draft. I know most of you are thinking that Brandon Knight or Kemba Walker should have been the selection here, but it looks like Bryan Colangelo has faith in Jerryd Bayless and Jose Calderon.
Bayless is still young and has potential to be the franchise point guard of the future.
There could have definitely been worse selections, Raps fans. Jonas has the most upside out of anyone in this draft.Valanciunas is another project, but lately, the Raptors have been getting A’s on all their projects. Let’s hope that trend continues.
Best case scenario: Joakim Noah’s energy with Pau Gasol’s offense
Worst Case Scenario: Primos Brezec
Click here for more Raptors content.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?