Featured Video
Man Utd Rebuild Continues ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ

Breaking: Windsor speaks on USF1′s failure

Negative Camber
Sep 24, 2010

The economic recession and disputes within Formula 1 killed USF1โ€ฒs chance of making it to the grid this year, co-founder Peter Windsor says in his first interview on the subject.

Windsor spoke to the BBC. Hereโ€™s highlights:

"

โ€œWe had our backer, we knew what we were going to do, we felt we had everything in place,โ€ said Windsor.

โ€œWe did miss the crash test by three weeks โ€“ and if we had had those three weeks we would have been racing now.โ€

[snip]

โ€œWe were confirmed as an entered team in July [2009] but that was when there were still two championships,โ€ said Windsor, a reference to the then possibility of the teams launching their own rival world championship as a result of a seismic political battle in F1.

โ€œThe two championships only came together in September and that was when we effectively pressed go.

โ€œAt that moment, if we had gone to perhaps Lola, or a company like that who was building cars, I think we would have been OK.

โ€œBut the premise of our team, the foundation of our team, was a) to be a national team and b) to do our car in America.

โ€œI think if we had a year we could have done it, but it was either the whole car or nothing at all.

โ€œIt was Ken Andersonโ€™s call and he said it would kill our team if we didnโ€™t build our own car. He would rather go down doing our own rather than race someone elseโ€™s. I didnโ€™t agree with that.

โ€œIt was just a question of time โ€“ and most of the existing teams will be two thirds of the way through their 2011 cars already. We didnโ€™t start a 2010 car until too late, in retrospect, but we didnโ€™t know it at the time.โ€

"

So we have a little peek inside. Peter is distancing himself from the decisions that, in his opinion at least, led to USF1โ€ฒs failure โ€” the desire to do it all on their own and in America. Hindsight probably tells us that was a losing proposition, but that was the basis for things so, to an extent, I understand why Anderson wanted to press on with the program.

The story doesnโ€™t dive too deeply (at this point) into any specific economic issues. Maybe broadly calling on the โ€œrecessionโ€ is enough explanation.

But Iโ€™m really interested in the โ€œsplitโ€ championships line of thinking. Did that really slow things up that much? If USF1 had just pressed ahead with an attitude of โ€œweโ€™re going to be in F1 whether Ferrari and McLaren are,โ€ wouldnโ€™t they have made the grid? Again, I can see how that might be a stumbling block, but if you are a brand-new team trying to get into the sport, donโ€™t you just worry about getting into the sport and not whether the biggest and baddest teams will still be there?

Well, thatโ€™s what I see from a quick, first-blush look. Thoughts, folks?