Five Reasons Why England Are Better Off Without Frank Lampard
By (Featured Columnist) on September 3, 2010
248 reads
Lampard
Clive Mason/Getty Images
Frank Lampard has picked up 83 international caps for England, but his performances for the Three Lions have never truly won over the fans who doubt his credentials.
And seeing as the 32-year-old will miss England's opening Euro 2012 qualifiers against Bulgaria and Switzerland through injury, there are some who see his absence as the perfect time to leave Lampard behind.
Here are five reasons England would be better without him.
1. Steve Gerrard Becomes the Focal Point in Midfield
Gerrard
Michael Regan/Getty Images
With Lampard out, Fabio Capello looks set to go with Steven Gerrard in central midfield—his preferred position—and not out wide.
Seeing as Gerrard is potentially England's most influential player, it surely makes sense to play him where he's been since the age of seven.
2. Lampard Is Too Old
Lampard
Clive Mason/Getty Images
Lampard will turn 34 during Euro 2012, and would therefore be 36 at World Cup 2014—seriously pushing the age boundaries for a central midfielder who plays almost every game at club level.
England should surely plan for the future.
3. Lampard Has Never Produced for England
Lampard
Clive Mason/Getty Images
While Lampard has been a loyal servant for his country, we've never truly seen the kind of match-winning form he shows on a weekly basis with Chelsea.
He's survived too long on reputation and not on his performance in an England shirt.
4. Time for the Next Generation
Jack Rodwell
Alex Livesey/Getty Images
In Jack Rodwell and Jack Wilshere, England have two young players who can operate centrally to compliment Gareth Barry and Steven Gerrard. Why not blood them now and watch them grow?
5. Walcott and Johnson Released
Walcott
Michael Regan/Getty Images
With Lampard out, Gerrard comes inside and a position on the flank becomes available. This will mean a chance for Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson tonight (possibly both)—arguably two of England's potentially most effective attackers.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?
Flag This Article
2 Comments
Loading comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete