The Playoff Implications of Portland's Victory Over Los Angeles
With the NBA playoffs only a week away, this game had countless playoff implications for both teams.
To start with, Portland played the entire second half without their star guard, Brandon Roy. Roy was suffering from sore right knee and did not return after halftime.
The fact that the remaining Trail Blazer players were able to beat the Lakers in the second half without their go-to guy should be a huge confidence builder heading into the playoffs.
Portland struggled in their series against Houston in the first round of the playoffs last year when Roy wasn't on the court and they mainly relied on him for their offense in the series.
It's good to see that this year's team is able to not only play but beat the top team in the Western Conference without Brandon Roy on the floor.
The next important result of the game is that Portland took the season series from Los Angeles edging them 2-1.
This is important because the Trail Blazers could end up facing the Lakers in the first round of the playoffs and they should have more confidence against a team they beat two out of three in the regular season.
And if that matchup does happen, Portland now knows that they have a defender to shut down Kobe Bryant in Nicolas Batum.
Sure Bryant scored 20 points in the game.
But he also took 23 shot attempts, made only eight, and scored seven points below his season average.
That's a major weapon that Portland now possesses if Batum can continue to keep opposing star players from their typical production.
The Blazers did get lucky in this game.
I mean how often do you see Kobe Bryant and Derek Fisher miss three straight free throws?
In the playoffs, if Portland faces Los Angeles, they better not wait around for the Lakers to miss shots that they did tonight because that's not going to happen often.
There are a lot of good things Portland should be able to take away from this game and it will be fun to watch them make a deep run in the playoffs.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?