Jose Reyes Has a Thyroid Problem...According to Whom?
A thyroid problem. The Mets say yes. Reyes says no.
Who to believe?
Jose Reyes has an overactive thyroid.
The Mets said late Tuesday that tests administered in New York on Monday confirmed the original diagnosis. The club said little else except that Reyes is to remain in New York for additional blood tests, which will determine how he is treated.
The results of those tests are not expected before Thursday.
Reyes told ESPNDeportes.com's Enrique Rojas later Tuesday, "The specialists who took care of me in New York have told me that I'm fine and that there's nothing wrong with my thyroid. The test [taken to follow one conducted during his physical] showed that I'm fine. We just have to wait for the results of the additional test. The [doctors] found inflammation in my throat and no medicine to treat the thyroid or any other condition has been prescribed."
This year was supposed to be the year that Reyes showed all of his doubters that he was healthy.
Even though he rarely missed games from 2006-2008, the injury-prone label has never fully escaped Reyes especially after missing most of the 2009 season.
We have talked in the past about the 2011 team option facing Reyes, $9 million, I remain confident that the Mets will pick up the option.
However, if the thyroid condition pops up at any point in the season, it could sound the alarm for the Mets, especially if Reyes is struggling.
We'll see how this thyroid issue affects Reyes moving forward, but there is no doubt that until he proves his detractors wrong, this will be another issue facing Reyes.
There was a time where I seriously believed that Reyes was sure to land a contract exceeding $100 million when he became a free agent after 2011 (assuming the Mets picked up his option after the 2010 season), but after missing most of 2009 and now the thyroid issue, that claim is now filled with tons of doubt.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?