St. Peter's-Manhattan: Jaspers Respond To Loss, Blowout Peacocks
Entering Friday, the Manhattan Jaspers had just lost two heartbreakers, giving Marist their first win of the season and then blowing a 16-point lead against Rider, ending with a Mike Ringgold tip-in to give the Broncs a 65-64 win.
The Jaspers desperately needed to win—and they prevailed.
Manhattan (7-8, 2-3 MAAC) started off with a bang, similar to their start versus Rider. The Jaspers quickly went ahead 10-5, and stretched their lead to as high as 16, before the half concluded with the score at 40-26, in favor of the Jaspers. Manhattan would go on to win 76-53. St. Peter's never led after they held a two point lead 1:14 into the game.
Jasper fans awaited the downfall of the dominating Manhattan lead, but it only fell as low as six points when the score was 26-20 with 8:29 left in the first half.
St. Peter's (7-8, 2-3 MAAC) had no response for the Jaspers' Brandon Adams (15 points, 8 rebounds, 2 blocks) in the post, and Rico Pickett (19 points) and Darryl Crawford (15 points, 4 rebounds, 5 assists) on the perimeter.
The Jaspers had 18 points off the bench—10 points from Antoine Pearson, and 8 points from freshman guard George Beamon.
Nick Leon led the Peacocks with 12 points. Steven Samuels and Wesley Jenkins added 10 each, with Jenkins contributing 4 assists.
The main factor for Manhattan was that they consistently worked for good shots, and converted them. The Jaspers made 30 of their 50 attempts from the field, for a whopping 60 percent. The Jaspers also made 7-of-13 three-pointers, while converting 9-of-13 free throws.
St. Peter's returns home to face the Niagara Purple Eagles on Monday, Jan. 11.
The Jaspers picked up the must-win victory at home on Friday night, and travel to Connecticut to face the Fairfield Stags on Sunday, Jan. 10.
Picture from gojaspers.com
For more news on the Manhattan Jaspers, follow Jesse Kramer On Twitter.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?