Why Trading Boston's Jonathan Papelbon Is a Stupid Idea

Josh LevittSenior Analyst IOctober 12, 2009

NEW YORK - MAY 04:  Jonathan Papelbon #58 of the Boston Red Sox reacts after getting the final out of the game with the bases loaded against the New York Yankees on May 4, 2009 at Yankee Stadium in the Bronx borough of New York City. The Red Sox defeated the Yankees 6-4.  (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Now that the Red Sox have been eliminated in painful fashion, let the panic trade rumors begin! First up, yesterday's goat, Jonathan Papelbon:

"In the wake of Boston's 7-6 loss to Los Angeles in the ALDS, message boards and Twitter feeds everywhere wondered if Papelbon had thrown his last pitch in a Red Sox uniform. Over on Fox Sports, Ken Rosenthal suggested that Papelbon would be the one to take the fall for his team's quick playoff exit.

"Trading an elite relief pitcher who just saved 38 games with a 1.85 ERA during the regular season would seem to be the type of reaction easily dismissed as a knee-jerk notion made in the heat of a disappointing loss.

"But the truth is that the idea has been quietly discussed by the members of Red Sox Nation for some time now. Papelbon still has two years of arbitration remaining before free agency, and he was just awarded $6.25 million in 2009, a record for a pitcher. The thinking in New England circles is that GM Theo Epstein could command a decent trade package for Papelbon in the offseason and Billy Wagner could fill the 2010 closer's job at a cheaper rate.

"Daniel Bard, meanwhile, will get more experience to be Boston's future fireman."

The idea to trade Papelbon this offseason is just flat-out dumb. I know Red Sox fans are pissed off about the ALDS and how Game Three ended, but trading Papelbon is not the answer.

Firstly, there is already an absurd number of closers out there on the free agent market. Why would any team pay a premium price for Papelbon when there are so many effective, lower cost options available (Kevin Gregg, Jose Valverde, Mike Gonzalez, Rafael Soriano)?

In addition, one of the ideas why the Red Sox would trade Papelbon is because his salary is becoming too exorbitant. Papelbon earned $6.25 million this season and will be due another raise in arbitration this winter. But lemme ask you this: What team out there is willing to pay a closer between $8-$10 million annually?

The Phillies owe Brad Lidge $23 million over the next two seasons. Cross them off the list.

The Mets, Yankees, Angels, Dodgers, Giants, Twins, White Sox, and Cardinals all have closers under contract for 2010. Cross them off the list.

The Cubs will have VERY limited payroll flexibility this winter. A deal for Papelbon might be out of their financial capability.

And does it make any sense for a team with a limited payroll (below $70-$80 million) to spend around $10 million plus prospects on a closer? No. So cross the Orioles, Rays, Padres, Diamondbacks, etc. off the list.

The only team I can think of that would be a logical destination is the Tigers, but do the Red Sox really want to trade Papelbon to one of their AL rivals? In addition, what "impact bat" can the Tigers send the Red Sox's way for GM Theo Epstein to justify trading his closer?

Finally, remember just how good Papelbon was this season. Sure, this was his down season, but his numbers were still gaudy and impressive: 38 saves with a 1.85 ERA. You can't tell me that the Red Sox would be better off in 2010 without that kind of production in their bullpen. And before yesterday, Papelbon had not allowed a SINGLE RUN in the postseason!

This guy is a top-three closer in baseball, and the Red Sox are lucky to have him on board (even with all his antics). Sure, Daniel Bard might be an effective closer, and Billy Wagner might provide a good option for 2010, but neither of those guys is in Papelbon's league right now.


(Jorge Says No! on Facebook)

(Follow Jorge Says No! on Twitter)