Oakland RaidersDownload App

Roger Goodell Comments on Raiders' Potential Move to Las Vegas

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, left, laughs as Oakland Raiders owner Mark Davis talks to the media after an NFL owners meeting Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2016, in Houston. The owners voted to allow the St. Louis Rams to move to a new stadium just outside Los Angeles, and the San Diego Chargers will have an option to share the facility. The Raiders, who also wanted to move to the area, could move to Los Angeles if San Diego doesn't. (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan)
Pat Sullivan/Associated Press
Adam WellsFeatured Columnist IVNovember 17, 2016

As the Oakland Raiders' future home remains up in the air, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell is not opposed to the franchise making a move to Las Vegas. 

Speaking on The Rich Eisen Show, via John Breech of CBSSports.com, Goodell said the Raiders' fate lies with the owners: "Ultimately, it's the ownership's decision. It requires 24 of the 32 owners to approve any relocation to any market."

However, Goodell noted that any speculation about where the Raiders could end up is "premature" right now and "there are specific issues that would need to be discussed in the context of Las Vegas."

The Raiders were hoping for a return to Los Angeles in 2016, but they withdrew their request to relocate on Jan. 12. NFL owners ultimately approved the Rams' move to L.A. for the 2016 season, with the Chargers granted the first opportunity to join them after next season. 

According to Jim Trotter of ESPN.com, the Raiders are next in line to join the Rams in L.A. if the Chargers decline their option. 

Even though it's not official the Raiders will return to Oakland next season, owner Mark Davis told Tim Kawakami of the San Jose Mercury News the team is finalizing a one-year lease to play at O.co Coliseum. 

After that, however, the Raiders could be on the move. Davis recently took a trip to Las Vegas for a meeting with Las Vegas Sands chairman Sheldon Adelson:

The Las Vegas Sands Corporation has proposed a $1 billion domed stadium in hopes of possibly luring an NFL team to the city, according to Howard Stutz of the Las Vegas Review-Journal

That project is just in the conceptual stage right now, but the economics would appeal greatly to the Raiders because Breech noted they currently have "zero public money" for a potential new stadium. 

While the NFL doesn't want any of its teams or employees to be associated with gambling to protect the integrity of the game, the league sent a memo to all 32 teams saying there is "no prohibition under league rules on a team moving to any particular city," per ESPN.com news services.

Mark Kiszla of the Denver Post does think the Raiders' potential new name has a certain ring to it:

The Raiders' long-term future remains very much unclear at the moment, but within the next 12 months, there is going to be some resolution to the situation. The franchise has been in Oakland since 1995 after moving from L.A.

Las Vegas certainly appears to have the resources and motivation to lure a professional franchise to the city, and the NFL isn't standing in the Raiders' way. It's going to be a fascinating year on the business side of the sport.   

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices