JaMarcus Russell: Make or Break Season
It may be the beginning of July but there is no denying the fact that the Oakland Raiders sit proudly atop the AFC West.
Setting aside my flippancy this is a crucial year for the Raiders franchise. Specifically it is a crucial year for quarterback JaMarcus Russell.
This is Russell's third year. In recent years the likes of Philip Rivers and Eli Manning were proven NFL starters by the end of the same period. Ben Roethlisberger had famously won a Super Bowl by the end of his second year and of course there are last year's rookie sensations Joe Flacco and Matt Ryan for Russell to emulate.
Adding to the pressure is the fact that Oakland acquired a veteran alternative in the off season. Jeff Garcia did not join the Raiders to hold a clip board and take in the tourist sites of the Bay Area. He will expect to start.
The Raiders will officially support JaMarcus Russell and will continue with the established rhetoric of Garcia being a mentor/backup figure.
In reality Russell is one early poor performance away from getting benched.
Al Davis wants to win and win now. Garcia is insurance for the Raiders and the 79 year-old owner (80 on July 4) will have no hesitation in clamouring for Garcia's inclusion whenever he thinks the Raiders have a superior chance of winning with the former 49er stalwart.
Al Davis has invested plenty of dollars into JaMarcus Russell and publicly has lavished praise on his quarterback—cast your minds back to last season and "that" press conference.
The former LSU standout also has many positives in his favour: A strong arm, a great habit of not throwing interceptions and he finished the 2009 season in impressive fashion leading Oakland to wins over Houston and Tampa Bay with Russell throwing four touchdowns in the process.
That said the acquisition of Jeff Garcia is a statement of intent by the Raiders.
Regardless of who is under centre, winning is now expected.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?