Pau Gasol Injury: Forward's Return Won't Help LA Lakers
Harry How/Getty Images
The problem is, Gasol's best is now behind him.
Gasol is regressing as a player, and the Lakers have more wrong with them than can be easily addressed by the return of the Spaniard.
But what we're now coming to realize is that at least half of that lineup on paper is now aging, yellowing, edge curling paper. The Lakers are vintage in a bad way.
And Gasol heads that up. He's posting just 12.6 points per game this season and is playing near a career low in minutes with just 34 per contest.
Gasol's field goal percentage is bad even for a guard, at 42 percent. He's also averaging his least rebounds since 2007-08 with just 8.8 rebounds per contest.
Gasol seems softer than ever, and trade rumors surrounding his name are abundant, as Alex Kay summed up last week.
At this point, that is the most that Gasol offers the Lakers: a potential trade chip.
Mitch Kupchak must realize that Gasol is not the answer to the struggles that have plagued the club, and if anything the 32-year-old forward is going to perpetuate those problems. The Lakers have gone 2-5 without Gasol and are now a full two games out of the playoffs.
If anyone is going to save the season, it will be Steve Nash. But even that is a long shot, as Nash is coming off major injury at age 38.
Truly, many are just beginning to realize the bar was set too high for the Lakers, anyway. Metta World Peace is having the best season he's had in ages, and it hasn't even mattered.
The Lakers seem mostly just to need another coaching change, but how bad would it look to fire D'Antoni after already having fired Mike Brown this season? At this point, they are basically stuck holding on to Kobe's boyhood idol.
D'Antoni has the Lakers playing horrendous defense this year, and that was supposed to be Mike Brown's calling card. Sans Phil Jackson, are the Lakers beginning to regret that they weren't more patient with the Zen Master?
With so many things wrong, only one thing is clear: Pau Gasol can't make them right.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?