Baltimore Ravens Missing Terrell Suggs' Pass Rush on 1st, 2nd Downs
Patrick Smith/Getty Images
Clearly, it was obvious that the Baltimore Ravens' ferocious pass rush was going to be hurt without hybrid linebacker Terrell Suggs on the field this year. Suggs, who suffered an Achilles tendon tear in the spring, is set to be sidelined for much of—if not the entirety of—the 2012 season.
Though we're just three games in, it's clear where the Ravens are missing Suggs' contributions the most—on first and second downs.
Last season, Suggs had 14 sacks, with five of those on first downs and four on second. So far this year, the Ravens as a team have combined for eight sacks, with only two on first and one on second downs.
All of those first-down sacks came on a 1st-and-10, killing opponents' momentum before it even began and forcing them to dig out of holes that they often could not escape. Second-down sacks do much of the same, especially when it results in offenses facing an oft-insurmountable 3rd-and-long. Even when Suggs' early-down pressure didn't result in a quarterback sack, it often caused incomplete passes and interceptions thanks to being forced into throwing too quickly.
This was the crux of the Ravens high-production pass rush last year, and now that they're without it, they have gone from being the fourth-best pass defense in the league last year to 28th through the first three games of this season.
Albert McClellan and rookie Courtney Upshaw have taken over rotationally at the rush linebacker position that was Suggs' for last season (aside from when he was lined up as a defensive end—Pernell McPhee has taken over those snaps). So far, Upshaw and McPhee have a half-sack apiece, but beyond that, the main sack producers this season have been nose tackle Haloti Ngata (2.5) and linebacker Dannell Ellerbe (2.5).
Without Suggs, opposing defenses aren't entirely worried about consistent, unyielding pressure coming from his side of the field. While this has opened opportunities for other members of the Ravens defense, missing Suggs has resulted in a different and less effective approach to the pass rush—blitzing.
Opposing offenses are fairly adept at picking up on the blitzes thrown at them. There is an element of surprise, to be sure, but an unsuccessful blitz results in uncovered or single-covered receivers downfield and an opportunity to make a play if the quarterback can stay protected or get a throw out in time.
With a traditional pass rush, the Ravens didn't have to sacrifice coverage in the backfield. Now that they do, they're giving up many more pass yards. The blitz, clearly, is less effective for Baltimore than sending Suggs to repeatedly do the dirty work.
A player of Suggs' caliber obviously cannot be replaced by just any linebacker, committee of backers or anyone else. We were all well aware his absence would affect the entire Baltimore defensive production, but now that the season is underway we can see exactly how.
It's not just that Baltimore lacks a pass rush, it's that it lacks one that can hold quarterbacks at bay. Blitzing isn't what the Ravens are best at, but now they've had to adapt on the fly and thus far it's not yielding the desired results when it comes to opposing offenses keeping drives alive.
Yes, the Ravens are 2-1, but more than ever that has had to do with their offense stepping up and filling the void left by Suggs and not the rest of the defense. That first- and second-down pass rush was clearly the calling card of Baltimore's defense with Suggs in the mix, and now that he's sidelined, they need to find another way to produce drive-killing stops.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?