Tim Tebow: Why Denver Broncos QB Will Go to Pro Bowl
Tebow is now 6-1 as a starting quarterback this season and has the Broncos in a first-place tie in the AFC West with the Oakland Raiders.
The way he plays the quarterback position might not be pretty, but it's been effective this year.
And, in a down year for quarterbacks in the AFC, Tebow deserves to play in the Pro Bowl.
Here are three reasons Tebow deserves a trip to Hawaii.
1. He Takes Care of the Ball
In order to win in the NFL, you have to win the turnover battle.
That's exactly what Tebow does for the Broncos. He has only thrown one interception in his seven starts this season and has only fumbled twice.
By not making too many mistakes, he gives his team a chance to extend drives and win games.
The way he plays isn't always pretty, but I'd rather have Tebow on my sideline than a guy like Philip Rivers right now.
Rivers costs his team wins with big turnovers late in the fourth quarter. Tebow hasn't had that problem.
Does Tebow deserve to go to the Pro Bowl?
2. He's Clutch Late in Games
If the Broncos are within a touchdown late in the fourth quarter, it's becoming a sure thing that Tebow will lead the Broncos to a victory, or at least give them a chance to win.
He's won two overtime games and five of his six victories this season have come by seven points or less.
If he can continue that trend, there's no reason the Broncos can't win the AFC West and make it to the playoffs.
3. There Aren't Three Better Quarterbacks in the AFC
Baltimore's Joe Flacco has been very inconsistent and Houston's Matt Schaub is hurt.
Cincinnati's Andy Dalton is certainly deserving, but if the Bengals continue to lose to good teams, it'll be hard to put him in the Pro Bowl ahead of Tebow.
Other than that, it's been a bad year for AFC quarterbacks.
So, why wouldn't a guy who is 6-1 as a starter and responsible for one of the biggest turnarounds in the NFL this year get a shot at the Pro Bowl?
Plus, sending Tebow to Hawaii might actually make the Pro Bowl watchable this year.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?