FerrariDownload App

Formula 1: Can Two DRS Zones Save the 2011 Abu Dhabi GP from Tedium?

ABU DHABI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - NOVEMBER 14:  Sebastian Vettel of Germany and Red Bull Racing is pictured in the lead after the start during the Abu Dhabi Formula One Grand Prix at the Yas Marina Circuit on November 14, 2010 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.  (Photo by Vladimir Rys/Getty Images)
Vladimir Rys/Getty Images
Craig ChristopherAnalyst INovember 9, 2011

Is it possible for two DRS (drag reduction system) zones to save the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix from descending into the 100 minutes of tedium that was the 2010 Formula One season decider?

Going into the final race last year, all Fernando Alonso had to do to secure his third championship was cover Mark Webber, who was eight points down, and Sebastian Vettel, who was a further five points back.

Perhaps thinking that Vettel was too far back, Ferrari chose just to cover Webber allowing Vettel to simply drive off into the distance to secure the race win.

Webber had a horror day and the decision to cover him by Ferrari ended up seeing Alonso trapped behind Renault’s Vitaly Petrov for a stultifying 37 laps.

Alonso finished in seventh place, Vettel finished first to snatch his unlikely championship and the overwhelming impression that fans got was that it was a tedious race.

The number of on-track overtaking manoeuvres could be counted on one hand—with plenty of fingers to spare.

If it wasn’t for the championship intrigue, it could well have been the most heinously boring race in F1 history.

This year, there isn’t even the championship to hold our interest and therefore the FIA has had to dip twice into its bag of gimmicks to attempt to provide a veneer of interest to yet another unnecessary stop on the F1 world tour.

The current calendar is filled with races in countries with no F1 tradition. There is no real passion for the sport at the grass-roots level and it seems that the races are just being used as a fashion accessory for governments.

The tracks are cookie cutter creations, doled out by Hermann Tilke and the driving criteria behind them is that they look good on television, rather than exciting racing.

So we’re back to hoping that a bit of technical trickery will make up for inadequate track design and the complexities of the modern F1 car design. DRS, however, has not proven to be the consistent game changer that it was held out to be.

If the DRS zones are badly placed—again—then it will have little or no effect whatsoever.

After the 2010 debacle, the race organisers were “encouraged” to look at modifying the track to encourage overtaking. The early tentative successes of KERS, DRS and Pirelli tyres in 2011 convinced the organisers to hold off for a year.

We’ll find out soon if that was a good decision. Somehow, it doesn't seem likely.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices