Helping Vince McMahon: Who Should WWE Let Go?

« Prev
1 of 21
Next »
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse the slideshow
Helping Vince McMahon: Who Should WWE Let Go?
Mark A. Wallenfang/Getty Images
Getty Images

Well, it's been 6 months since my last (and first) article, so I need to shake off some rust–therefore I will try and hold back on the sarcasm. Here's the link to my first article if you're interested... it was titled "10 Things You Should Have Learned From Watching WWE as a Kid":

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/491456-10-things-you-should-have-learned-from-watching-wwe-as-a-kid#page/12

 

 

*WARNING* 

The following article is lengthy and probably boring at some points. It might take like 20 minutes to read. There is some pretty serious stuff mixed with some not so serious stuff. 

Anyways, here we go...

It is expected that Vince McMahon will soon kill some dreams by releasing a few superstars. 

While it's never set in stone who will get axed, it is always fun to speculate...after all, 90% of the fun in following WWE is trying to predict what will happen!

I just got back from the doctor, so I will "diagnose" each superstar based on how likely they are to survive in 2011.

Due to the large amount of superstars, some will be lumped together to cut down on slide #'s. Superstars will be categorized as healthy, on life support, dead weight, or the like. This article will deal with mostly Raw superstars. If I get some positive feedback, I'll continue with Smackdown and Women's divisions at a future date.

In the spirit of the medical profession, I will also try and suggest some storyline "antidotes" to help revive their careers (unless they are terminal, of course!)

Begin Slideshow »
Load More Stories

Follow B/R on Facebook

WWE

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.