Sign up or login to track your favorite teams

Sign Up for Bleacher Report

As a registered user you can subscribe to your favorite teams, post comments, write your own articles, and much more.

You must register in order for that functionality to work!








Validating sign up form ...

Bleacher Report articles are written by fans like you

Do you want to cover your favorite sports, teams, and leagues?

Processing writing preferences ...

Great, , you're signed up!

i.e. Big 10, LeBron James, USC Football

Selected Tags:

Logging in ...

Now that the New York Giants and New Orleans Saints have pulled off the trade of Jeremy Shockey, does this spell disaster for the Giants in 2008? Or will Shockey tear apart the Saints team chemistry? I say neither will happen...

Shock Therapy: Analysis Of The Shockey Trade

by Stove Pipe (Scribe)

0

211 reads

Opinion

July 25, 2008


Now that the New York Giants and New Orleans Saints have pulled off the trade of Jeremy Shockey, does this spell disaster for the Giants in 2008? Or will Shockey tear apart the Saints team chemistry?

I say neither will happen. This trade is as close as possible to a win-win for both teams, however cliche. Both should receive a boost from the trade, albeit the Giants will have to wait until next year to see exactly what they get.

Here's my two-cents on both Shockey and the trade.

Since being drafted with the 14th pick out of Miami in 2002, Jeremy Shockey has been an enigma.

Blessed with an awesome combination of size, speed, hands and attitude he took New York and the NFL by storm, catching 74 balls for 894 yards and making the Pro Bowl as a rookie. Over the last six seasons he's second only to Tony Gonzales with 371 catches as a tight end, accounting for 4200 yards and 27 touchdowns.

Yet despite his talent, Shockey was always a distraction for the Giants.

Aggressive and rambunctious as he was on the field, he was that loud and overbearing off of it. He fumed to reporters about passes not being thrown to him, and had miriad differences with teammates and coaches. He was a one-man media circus, even in media mad New York.

Shockey seldom attended off-season workouts, preferring to do his conditioning at the "U" with Miami guys. All of this seemed to be okay with management, especially owners Wellington Mara and Bob Tisch, both of whom were extremely close to him.

Things changed when Tom Coughlin came on board. He and Shockey were like oil and water and things got worse when both Mara and Tisch died in 2005. With Shockey's benefactors were gone, it was only a matter of time before something gave way. 

It was no secret that Coughlin wanted Shockey to work out in New York, but Shockey refused. It was just another example Shockey being Shockey. He always showed up in great shape and ready to play, but like everything else it was on his terms.

Things finally blew up last year, although no one knew it at the time. When Shockey broke his leg in the Giants 14th game, his season was over. The prevailing thought was that the Giants season was over also.

But after Shockey went down, things improved for New York. Eli Manning became visibly looser and played much better. Amani Toomer became a bigger part of the offense, and Kevin Boss stepped in at tight end did a good job blocking and receiving. It was the beginning of the end of Shockey, as the Giants figured out they could live without him.

The end result was an off-season of bewilderment and questions. As soon as the Super Bowl was over, the media frenzy started.

 "Are the Giants a better team without Shockey" in all it's variations, and the inevitable Shockey responses were media fodder all winter. And it would lead, as everyone guessed to the trade that happened last week. That the deal didn't get done on draft day was a disservice to Shockey, and a loss to the Giants.

Now that it is done, my immediate reaction is the Giants are a less talented team minus Shockey. However else you want to spin it, you can't replace 70 catches a year at tight end very easily.

Track this Article on My B/R
Flag This Article
Share This Article

0 commentsLeave a Comment

Leave a Comment

  • You must register to post a comment.

  • Want to write for Bleacher Report

    We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

    Learn More and Sign Up »



    Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
    Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.