Listed below, are the points and counterpoints that Aaron Harang supporters and critics can have regarding his prospects for the upcoming season:
Point: Yes, something is wrong.
Counterpoint: No, Aaron Harang will be back to his former self in 2010.
P: Something is wrong with his mechanics.
CP: What is this based on?
P: Harang has been tinkering with his mechanics over the past few years. He needs to get back to what was working.
CP: Last August, he was shut down after he had an appendectomy. At that point, he was on pace for 200+ IP with an ERA+ of 102. While that is not Cy Young Award—caliber numbers, but they are decent.
P: He gave up a lot of hits last year. His WHIP was 1.41.
CP: His 4.21 ERA is what you should expect out of him. Not to mention, he only walked 43 batters.
P: Over the last two years, his record is 12—31.
CP: Don't judge him by his win count.
CP: There are many better ways by which to judge a pitcher. Wins are largely determined by run support. A pitcher can give up 8 runs and get a win. On the flip side, he can give up one run and get a loss.
P: I realize that he has had poor run support in the past two years.
CP: He had 16 starts where he and his defense gave up three or fewer runs. He would have a few more wins if his team would have scored.
P: More runs would have helped.
CP: Harang is the type of pitcher who usually pitches long enough in to the game to earn the decision, one way or the other.
P: Something happened in 2008 that caused him to get much worse.
CP: Like what?
P: Could it be the game in 2008 when Harang threw 63 pitches in relief then made his next start?
CP: That certainly seems like poor judgement in retrospect.
P: It sure does. His production was going down before that outing, also.
CP: His numbers were still pretty good last year.
P: Since 2008, his K/9 has gone down and his BB/9 has gone up.
CP: His velocity is still there. He has always thrown around 90 MPH, which is what he averaged last year.
P: He has that but that nasty slider is gone.
CP: He may have lost some movement on it.
P: You got that right. It seems likely that he made a change in his mechanics in 2008 that has brought on the drop in effectiveness we are now seeing.
CP: The slider is the type of pitch that is either effective or not. If it isn't thrown correctly it ends up in the seats.
P: That could explain his HR/9 going up.
CP: It could be the problem.
P: He has talked about shortening his stride since that San Diego outing.
CP: Pitchers tinker with their mechanics from time—to—time.
P: Harang isn't really an ace on a good team.
CP: I agree with that. It is unreasonable to expect ace—like numbers.
P: Good, because he won't deliver it.
CP: If he can put up a 4.25 ERA and throw around 200 innings, the Reds will take it. That production takes the load off those promising young arms.
P: He's got one year left on his contract. I think his numbers will sink even lower. The Reds have to be hoping that he can pitch well in July. They could then trade him for a prospect.
CP: I expect Harang to put up what he always does.
P: Maybe Harang's success was an illusion. Maybe in 2006 and 2007 he was getting by on smoke and mirrors.
CP: Yeah, that makes sense. He was using magic. Good one.
Please go here for more good stuff.