Weekly College Baseball Poll: By the Numbers
I continue to be thoroughly amazed, abused, and completely flabbergasted by the incestuous nature of the collegiate athletics polling systems, especially the college baseball polls.
What should be a very simple process has warped into the absurd.
The Pac-10 Conference has the only two undefeated teams in America. They are ranked second (Arizona State 20-0) and 11th (UCLA 16-0), with a combined record of 36-0.
TOP NEWS

Braun: I'm Nuggets' Leader 🤔

Former NBA player fires back at Draymond
.jpg)
Why Walker Knew He'd Leave Seahawks
The ACC, by comparison, has its top two teams ranked first (Virginia 17-3) and third (Florida State 15-4), with a combined record of 32-7.
The SEC continues in step with the increasingly irrational, yet hyperbolic and funny math formula trend, as their top two teams are ranked fourth (Florida 16-3) and eighth (LSU 16-3) nationally, with a combined record of 32-6.
Now, 32-6 or 32-7 compared to 36-0 looks a little shaky to the eye, but now let us wander over yonder to the Big 12 Conference, where the funny math becomes surreal. Texas, at 15-5, is ranked sixth, 12 spots ahead of their Red River rivals (Oklahoma) who at 18th are 18-2. The combined record for the top two teams once again is 33-7.
Now, does anybody have two teams within their conference undefeated with an overall record of 36-0?
Anybody even close, for that matter?
Secondly...if your record is 15-5 and another conference member is 18-2, shouldn't 18-2 be ranked higher, especially when the strength of schedule issue is a virtual draw or radically superior?
Any Calls for "Keep it Simple, Stupid?"
To all the baseball experts involved in the polling system, please listen up.
This obviously isn't foolproof for the simple reason that I don't think foolproof actually exists, but why not start by grouping the schools in tiers of five or six per group, according to the number of losses, and then compare ranking indexes like the RPI and SOS to eliminate the confusion?
For example, all the teams with fewer than three losses are grouped into one tier, which would include Arizona State, UCLA, Oklahoma, Louisville, Clemson, and Alabama.
You could make an argument for Southeast Louisiana, but their RPI rating of 196 doesn't exactly qualify under the elite status heading, so I won't bore you with the analytical breakdown of their inclusion within this group.
The next grouping of schools, those with three losses, are lumped together as well. They would include Virginia, Coastal Carolina, LSU, Florida, Georgia Tech, Oregon State, and TCU.
The grouping of schools with four losses would include Florida State, South Carolina, Stanford, and Texas A&M.
Finally, and quite frankly, at this point in the season, any team with more than five losses should not resonate anywhere even close to the Top 25. So in my humble opinion, we could eliminate the grouping of schools at this point in the season after five losses.
Perhaps a team could sneak into the tail end of the Top 25 with more than five or six losses, but it should be rare if we are doing the poll any justice.
By that same token, how realistic is the current Rivals.com poll, which actually places two traditional powers, Rice (12-9) and East Carolina (11-8), in the current top 25, when you have a whole host of schools looking outside the list like Washington State (11-5, RPI of 18, with an SOS of six), Arizona (16-4, RPI 32, with an SOS of 50), or Vanderbilt (16-4, RPI of 24, with an SOS of 46)? These schools not only pass the eyeball test of having better records, but they also have have Index Ratings (RPI and SOS) that are vastly superior.
A poll is based on real results, not hypothetical computer models...are you listening, college football writers and pollsters?
Given the information above, here is how I would group the schools to provide a fair and objective rating. This is based on something other than what I know about their tradition, or personal relationships with players, coaches, alumni, or corporate sponsors.
Please forgive me, but I like to keep things simple when making an objective decision.
A Simple Way To Rank College Baseball Teams: First Tier
|
Now, it is quite clear that UCLA, with an RPI of one and an SOS of nine, has played a radically superior schedule compared to Alabama, which has an RPI of three and an SOS of 74, according to BoydsWorld.com.
I mean, come on folks—comparing victories by the Bruins over baseball powers like Vanderbilt, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Mississippi State, (combined record of 57-17), to Alabama's victories over South Alabama, College of Charleston, Vanderbilt, and Minnesota, (combined record of 54-30), is an apples-to-oranges comparison, both in name (reputation of the opponent) and happenstance (overall performance record to date).
It becomes increasingly fraudulent when the next grouping of schools, those in the three-loss category, have better RPI Index and SOS Index performance indicators as compared to some schools in the initial top-five grouping.
A Simple Way To Rank College Baseball Teams: Second Tier
|
Now the information above is NOT the Road2Rosenblatts ranking poll, but rather an example of how I group the schools together before I begin the actual ranking process. I didn't follow it verbatim, as I think LSU should be ranked above Florida and feel their schedule and victories have been much more impressive thus far, even though the index ratings favor the Gators.
So there is some leeway, but nothing like the gaping holes you will see in the Rivals.com top-25 poll, which obviously shills to the corporate sponsorship of the SEC.
Seven teams ranked in the Top 25...are you kidding me?
At some point a pollster will need to pull the trigger and go with their gut instinct.
However, I think my grouping proposal offers much greater validity to the process versus going with the good ol' boy status quo, which is based on history, tradition, and other factors that are not played out between the chalk lines.
No offense intended for those that play on FieldTurf.
UPDATE: I failed to insert Clemson into the poll altogether, and this was a tremendous oversight on my part, as I originally had them at No. 8, next to Louisville.
In my original evaluation, I truly believed that Clemson is a top-10 team and may in fact be better placed within the top five, and I struggled with exactly where to place them.
However, since I can't go back and ask for a mulligan, let's place the Tigers into a fifth-place tie with Oregon State.
Clemson has the No. 2-ranked RPI Index next to UCLA, and their SOS (Strength of Schedule) is a solid 64th. To give you an idea, Louisville is ninth in RPI and has an SOS of 60, and Oregon State has an eighth-ranked RPI and an SOS of 22, so the Tigers are most certainly deserving.
My apologies to the Tigers...and to those who play off FieldTurf.






















Kentucky


.jpg)




.jpg)
.png)