NFL Game of the Week: Packers-Vikings Rematch

MJ Kasprzak by Senior Writer Written on November 01, 2009
MINNEAPOLIS - OCTOBER 05:  Quarterback Brett Favre #4 of the Minnesota Vikings celebrates after a touchdown during the game against the Green Bay Packers on October 5, 2009 at Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Minnesota.  (Photo by Jamie Squire/Getty Images) Jamie Squire/Getty Images

At 1:15pm PST (that's right—daylight savings is over, and it's time to change your clocks back to real time!), the second-place Green Bay Packers host the division-leading Minnesota Vikings.

It is a rematch of the Week Four matchup won by the Vikings, 30-23. And I think I have heard something about a future Hall of Fame traitor's return...

(Incidentally, for all of you still holding the ridiculous notion that The Traitor did not go to the Vikings to stick it to the Packers—catching us fans who love(d) him in the crossfire—read the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel piece from Oct. 31. In it, they examine his changing of a late third-down play from a clock-managing run to a deep pass to rub it in.)

But then, you have already ignored previous evidence of the team's efforts to talk him out of retirement, his declaration to Peter King that he was not forced out when he announced his retirement, reports that he fed an opponent inside information to help them still lose to the Packers—and his claim that even if he did, it's not against the rules, all but an admission he did do it—and how about his own admission that he did want to go to Minnesota last season out of revenge! So what's one more piece of evidence to refute your irrational position?

For me, this is about two rivals that hate each other and are the top contenders for the division title. I could care less about the quarterback matchup (And no, I am not one of those who says "could care less" when he means "couldn't care less"...I am acknowledging that it does matter to me, since denial of that would be as irrational in light of the above rant as the position that rant was directed toward).

So how do the teams match up? Let's first examine the injuries: CB Antoine Winfield will miss the game for the Vikings, while FB Korey Hall and WR Jordy Nelson will for the Packers.

TE JerMichael Finley is listed as doubtful for Green Bay, but I expect everyone else to play—several players have missed practice time for both teams and are listed as questionable or better, but they are not going to miss this key matchup.

Given the personnel losses, here is how the units compare:

 

Packers passing attack vs. Vikings pass defense: advantage, Green Bay

The loss of the Vikings best corner means more than the loss of the fourth wide receiver and platooning tight end combined, and the Packers had this matchup won with both teams healthy.

The Packers have the 10th-best passing attack in the league in yards per game (258.3) while the Vikings have the 20th-ranked pass defense (ironically, giving up less than the Packers attain, at 234.6).

Green Bay's offensive line—clearly its Achilles heel—is bolstered by the return of the tackles who have been their bookends over the past eight seasons, and the young players are improving.

And while the Vikings have played with a lead, leading to them facing more passes, the Packers have been in the lead almost as much, leading to running out the clock late.

 

Packers rushing attack vs. Vikings rush defense: advantage, Minnesota

On paper, these two teams seem close—Green Bay is ranked 13th (118/game) and the Vikings 10th (95.4), with both teams numbers being artificially high because of playing with leads. However, anyone who has been following the teams knows better.

In recent years, the Packers ground game has been inconsistent and the Vikings have been dominant. While it is fair to think this deep into the season that paradigm is shifting, it is foolish to think it has shifted as much as the stats indicate.

 

Vikings passing attack vs. Packers pass defense: advantage, Green Bay

Minnesota has the league's 13th-ranked passing attack (233.7) while Green Bay has the fourth-best pass defense (174). Both are equally affected by their scores coming in, but Green Bay is also among the league leaders in interceptions and takeaways, while Minnesota is only above average in preventing them.

The only shortcoming the Packers have here is the pass rush (supposedly improved in a 3-4), but it has not stopped them from attaining elite status.

 

Vikings rushing attack vs. Packers rush defense: advantage, Minnesota

Here again reason must win over statistics. Both teams rank 12th in their respective categories (97.5 yielded by Green Bay and 119.9 gained by Minnesota), and both teams are helped by the scores their opponents have faced.

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

How will The Traitor do in this contest?

  • Play poorly but win
  • Play poorly and lose
  • Play up-and down and win
  • Play up-and-down and lose
  • Play well and win
  • Play well but lose
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

How will The Traitor do in this contest?

  • Play poorly but win

    0.0%
  • Play poorly and lose

    8.0%
  • Play up-and down and win

    4.0%
  • Play up-and-down and lose

    16.0%
  • Play well and win

    56.0%
  • Play well but lose

    16.0%
  • Total votes: 75
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

23 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

754
reads

23
comments

written on November 01, 2009 Preview/Prediction

The best Packers newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.