Montreal Canadiens Need Depth: Sergei Kostitsyn Might Be the Answer
After two consecutive losses against the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Chicago Blackhawks, it has become painstakingly clear that the Montreal Canadiens do not have enough offensive depth to compete with the NHL's top-flight teams.
Once past the big first line, Tomas Plekanec, and Andrei Kostitsyn, what true offensive weapons do the Canadiens' possess?
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a fan of fan-favorite Maxim Lapierre, but he hasn't looked that great on the second line with Tomas Plekanec.
Although Lapierre does possess some offensive abilities, he just doesn't fit the mold of a second-line player.
Guillaume Latendresse would have been a better fit on the second line, as he has a better shot than Lapierre and can drive to the net using his size.
The "problem" with Latendresse is that he has been excelling on the third line with Glen Metropolit and Matt D'Agostini/Max Pacioretty.
Looking at the way Jacques Martin has handled his lineup so far, he isn't likely to fix it if it's not broken.
But the second line is broken, and with the personnel that Martin has, he simply can't fix it.
Bob Gainey needs to help Martin out, as he did when he brought in Marc-Andre Bergeron to add some firepower on the power play.
The Canadiens do have a great offensive player, albeit disgruntled, down in Hamilton, or wherever he is now that he's been suspended.
That would be Sergei Kostitsyn.
While this probably wouldn't be a popular pick, it's a pick Gainey will have to make.
Kostitsyn has the offensive panache to bring a spark to the second line, as well as light a fire under his brother, who seems like his mind is in the clouds right now.
Not only that, but Kostitsyn would add depth on a power play that has been struggling of late, especially last night in Chicago where either unit was unable to convert on a three-minute power play.
Lapierre could then return to his usual third line role, making him more effective.
So is Sergei Kostitsyn the answer? Maybe. But he's definitely a better answer than a third-line center playing wing on the second line.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?