The San Diego Chargers cleared another hurdle in their potential move north to Los Angeles.
However, Chargers President and CEO Dean Spanos made a statement saying the team will not relocate in 2016:
Today I decided our team will stay in San Diego for the 2016 season and I hope for the long term in a new stadium.I have met with Mayor Faulconer and Supervisor Roberts and I look forward to working closely with them and the business community to resolve our stadium dilemma. We have an option and an agreement with the Los Angeles Rams to go to Inglewood in the next year, but my focus is on San Diego.This has been our home for 55 years, and I want to keep the team here and provide the world-class stadium experience you deserve.Everyone on both sides of the table in San Diego must now determine the best next steps and how to deploy the additional resources provided by the NFL.I am committed to looking at this with a fresh perspective and new sense of possibility.
The Chargers' eventual arrival in the City of Angels feels almost inevitable. CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora noted the team is still expected to make the move, adding that it's just a matter of when.
Bleacher Report's Jason Cole posited a scenario in which Spanos' end goal was keeping the Chargers in their current home:
Lefkoe's Locks: Gambling Preview & Prediction for NFL Week 2
Gridiron Heights, Season 2 Ep. 1: 28-3 Jokes for Life
Why Pats' Cooks Is a Fire Fantasy Pick
Bold Predictions for 2017 NFL Season
Will Matt Ryan Be a Top 5 QB in 2017?
Will Marshall Bounce Back for Fantasy Owners in 2017?
Which Overvalued RBs Should You Avoid?
Why You Should Target Kenyan Drake as a Late-Round Sleeper
Which Value QBs Should Fantasy Owners Target Late?
Which NFL Superstar Should You Take #1 in Fantasy Drafts?
Happy Birthday to the Greatest QB of All-Time Tom Brady
From Tries to Touchdowns: Former English Rugby Star Is Set to Take on NFL
Top Storylines to Watch for in NFL Training Camp 2017
Eagles Players Beau Allen and Jason Kelce Surprise Local HS with BBQ
No Combine, No Cry: Bob Marley's Grandson Signs NFL Contract with Redskins
Insider Buzz: Several NFL Coaches 'Annoyed' Over Changes to Overtime
Giants DL Damon Attempts to Eat 72-oz Steak
Insider Buzz: Dolphins Expect Big Role for Rookie DE
Insider Buzz: Bills Expanding GM Search
Nathan Fenno of the Los Angeles Times downplayed the significance of Friday's news:
Nathan Fenno @nathanfenno
For all the talk of "negotiations" between the Rams and Chargers, the NFL put the framework for a deal in place earlier this month.2016-1-29 21:57:18
Nathan Fenno @nathanfenno
These weren't back and forth negotiations. Parameters were in place and hadn't changed significantly. The Chargers simply had to decide.2016-1-29 21:59:07
At the very least, though, this represents a further thawing of the animosity between Spanos and Kroenke, an issue on which ESPN's Jim Trotter reported Jan. 13: "It initially was uncertain whether Chargers owner Dean Spanos would seriously consider the offer because of bad blood between him and Kroenke, stemming from Kroenke's purchase of the 60-acre parcel at Hollywood Park in Inglewood, site of his proposed stadium and NFL village."
This issue remains far from resolved, but the signs continue pointing to the Chargers calling Los Angeles home at some point in the future.