The main complaint about the Washington Redskins draft that is making the rounds is that they didn’t “address” the defensive line. It’s a complaint heard almost every year as the Redskins do generally ignore the D-line during the annual selection meeting.
Of course, Rob Jackson of Kansas State, the defensive end that the Redskins took in the seventh round in the last dozen picks might take umbrage to such remarks, but nobody is expecting big things out of him, probably not even Mr. and Mrs. Jackson.
Not since 1997, when they tabbed Kennard Lang in the first round, have the Skins used their initial pick for a defensive lineman. Since then the first line of defense has received very limited draft-day attention in the form of late-round draft picks like Anthony Montgomery and Kedric Golston.
A funny thing has happened during the time that the Redskins have been neglecting the defensive line on the last weekend in April. The defense has been pretty good. Not necessarily great, not dominant, but good enough to win with.
How good? Starting with the 2000 season, the Redskins defense has been ranked 7, 13, 21, 24, 5, 9, 27, and 11 in points allowed. In those eight years they’ve been in the top 10 three times and in the top half of the league a total of five times.
Whatever method the Redskins are using to acquire defensive players has been working. To worry about where they have acquired their personnel is to be concerned with process over results.
The Redskins have not been mediocre this decade because of their defense. They have struggled because they haven’t been able to score points. In that same eight-year span, from 2000-2007 their NFL rankings in point scored have been 24, 28, 25, 22, 31, 13, 20, and 18. They haven’t been in the top 10 once and they were in the bottom half of the league in seven of the eight years.
That sounds to me like a team that needs to score more points. They have a ways to go here to move from being awful to merely run of the mill.
We keep on hearing that the Redskins should go after beefing up the defensive line because that’s how the Giants won the Super Bowl. It’s a copycat league and trying to overwhelm the other team with a fierce pass rush is a solid strategy in any era.
But the Giants weren’t the team that was on the verge of being anointed the greatest of all time. That team was the Patriots, the team that added three veteran wide receivers in the offseason and became the greatest scoring machine in league history.
Now, which team do you want to copy? The one that lost six games, had to become road warriors, and needed a miracle throw and catch to become the champs? Or the one that cruised through its schedule undefeated, stayed at home for the playoffs and was a mis-timed jump by Assante Samuel on what would have been a game-ending interception away from the best season ever?
6 comments Last one added about 1 year ago — Leave a Comment
Craig Garrison Sr about 1 year ago
Awesome breakdown Rich! My sentiments exactly, a point I had been trying to make in my own musings.
Edit Comment Cancel
Dan Stalcup about 1 year ago
You raise some good points, and I like your vote of confidence in the 'Skins, but the Giants proved the impact an explosive D-line can have. It can transform a decent team into Super Bowl Champions. By continuing to not focus early picks on the defensive line, it's much less likely for us to have the raw talent capable of being a truly great line.
Edit Comment Cancel
Dan Stalcup about 1 year ago
But I do look forward to our revamped receiving corps! I think all of the picks were pretty good, and I can't wait to see what all of the new members of the 'Skins will contribute.
Edit Comment Cancel
Dave Nemetz about 1 year ago
Your are most definitely Mr. Redskin, Rich. Congrats, you guys got a great TE in Fred Davis, he was the savior of the USC receiving corps all year. And as a reward he doesn't even have to get used to new uniform colors.
Edit Comment Cancel
Rich Tandler about 1 year ago
Thanks, Dave. The Davis selection was a "best available player" move and a good one. I can't wait to see how Zorn uses him and Chris Cooley on the field at the same time.
Edit Comment Cancel
Rohit Banerjee about 1 year ago
very very good article, i think it was a good move to take 3 pass catchers first just because worst case scenario, one of those three becomes a good receiver and best case, every single one becomes a pro bowl player that can be traded for high draft picks OR SOMEONE FOR THE DEFENSIVE LINE. I also like how noone mentions the career year andre carter had.
Edit Comment Cancel
Leave a Comment
You must register to post a comment.