The main complaint about the Washington Redskins draft that is making the rounds is that they didn’t “address” the defensive line. It’s a complaint heard almost every year as the Redskins do generally ignore the D-line during the annual selection meeting.
Of course, Rob Jackson of Kansas State, the defensive end that the Redskins took in the seventh round in the last dozen picks might take umbrage to such remarks, but nobody is expecting big things out of him, probably not even Mr. and Mrs. Jackson.
Not since 1997, when they tabbed Kennard Lang in the first round, have the Skins used their initial pick for a defensive lineman. Since then the first line of defense has received very limited draft-day attention in the form of late-round draft picks like Anthony Montgomery and Kedric Golston.
A funny thing has happened during the time that the Redskins have been neglecting the defensive line on the last weekend in April. The defense has been pretty good. Not necessarily great, not dominant, but good enough to win with.
How good? Starting with the 2000 season, the Redskins defense has been ranked 7, 13, 21, 24, 5, 9, 27, and 11 in points allowed. In those eight years they’ve been in the top 10 three times and in the top half of the league a total of five times.
Whatever method the Redskins are using to acquire defensive players has been working. To worry about where they have acquired their personnel is to be concerned with process over results.
Today's Must Reads
The Redskins have not been mediocre this decade because of their defense. They have struggled because they haven’t been able to score points. In that same eight-year span, from 2000-2007 their NFL rankings in point scored have been 24, 28, 25, 22, 31, 13, 20, and 18. They haven’t been in the top 10 once and they were in the bottom half of the league in seven of the eight years.
That sounds to me like a team that needs to score more points. They have a ways to go here to move from being awful to merely run of the mill.
We keep on hearing that the Redskins should go after beefing up the defensive line because that’s how the Giants won the Super Bowl. It’s a copycat league and trying to overwhelm the other team with a fierce pass rush is a solid strategy in any era.
But the Giants weren’t the team that was on the verge of being anointed the greatest of all time. That team was the Patriots, the team that added three veteran wide receivers in the offseason and became the greatest scoring machine in league history.
Now, which team do you want to copy? The one that lost six games, had to become road warriors, and needed a miracle throw and catch to become the champs? Or the one that cruised through its schedule undefeated, stayed at home for the playoffs and was a mis-timed jump by Assante Samuel on what would have been a game-ending interception away from the best season ever?
It’s funny how just a couple of plays can turn the perception of how you should build your team. If the ball bounces out of David Tyree’s grasp when he hits the ground, you should build your team to score points and obliterate the opposition. He catches it and suddenly every team needs to find an Osi and a Strahan in the middle rounds.
Devin Thomas, Fred Davis, and Malcolm Kelly will not turn Jason Campbell into Tom Brady. The Redskins will not win their first 18 games in 2008 or set the all time scoring record. But in time, perhaps as early as midseason, Thomas, Davis, and Kelly will be helping the Redskins score more points. By then Campbell should find the trio providing much more appealing targets than were Keenan McCardell, Reche Caldwell, and Todd Yoder.
If that happens, the biggest problem the team has had over the past eight years will be on its way to being solved.
They do not have to become a Pats-like dynamo to win more games. If they consistently can even score as many points as the average team in the league, that will be a major improvement.
Those who would rather fret over the process rather than look at the result will continue to do so. Too bad, they could be missing out on a lot of fun.
You can reach Rich Tandler by email at rich.tandler+bleachers@gmail.com. His Redskins blog archive is located here.
comments (6) write a comment »
write a new comment
4 months ago
Awesome breakdown Rich! My sentiments exactly, a point I had been trying to make in my own musings.
4 months ago
You raise some good points, and I like your vote of confidence in the 'Skins, but the Giants proved the impact an explosive D-line can have. It can transform a decent team into Super Bowl Champions. By continuing to not focus early picks on the defensive line, it's much less likely for us to have the raw talent capable of being a truly great line.
4 months ago
But I do look forward to our revamped receiving corps! I think all of the picks were pretty good, and I can't wait to see what all of the new members of the 'Skins will contribute.
4 months ago
Your are most definitely Mr. Redskin, Rich. Congrats, you guys got a great TE in Fred Davis, he was the savior of the USC receiving corps all year. And as a reward he doesn't even have to get used to new uniform colors.
4 months ago
Thanks, Dave. The Davis selection was a "best available player" move and a good one. I can't wait to see how Zorn uses him and Chris Cooley on the field at the same time.
3 months ago
very very good article, i think it was a good move to take 3 pass catchers first just because worst case scenario, one of those three becomes a good receiver and best case, every single one becomes a pro bowl player that can be traded for high draft picks OR SOMEONE FOR THE DEFENSIVE LINE. I also like how noone mentions the career year andre carter had.
write a new comment