The Oklahoma Sooners, your 2013 college football national champions!
Would you have a problem with that?
If you don't, then you must have loved the NCAA basketball tournament, where a fourth-place team from a slightly-less-than-power conference just won the national title. If you do, perhaps you're more of a college football purist who thinks the regular season should matter—a lot.
Either way, we're not here to take sides. Rather, we're here to present some hypotheticals mixed in with facts. Transitive property is used—but not too liberally—to advance a scenario where the Sooners would've won it all last season.
Pundits and critics who disliked the BCS have long advocated for a playoff that involved more than two teams, and they're not even close to being satisfied with the upcoming four-team College Football Playoff. At a minimum, they want 16 teams.
So they'll get 16 teams in our model, and it works because proportionally it best resembles the basketball tournament:
|Tournament teams||68 (19%)||16 (13%)|
|At-large entries||36 (53% of field)||6 (38% of field)|
|Most at-large per conference||10 (28% of at-large)*||2 (33% of at-large)|
*Big East sent a record 11 teams to 2011 tournament
Now, this is how the playoff field at the end of the 2013 regular season would've looked like after the selection committee picked six at-large teams to go with 10 conference champions and then seeded them. The only restriction is that no conference may place more than two at-large entries:
First Round (campus sites)
No. 1 Florida State (ACC) vs. No. 16 UL-Lafayette (Sun Belt)***
No. 2 Auburn (SEC) vs. No. 15 Rice (C-USA)***
No. 3 Michigan State (Big Ten) vs. Bowling Green (MAC)***
No. 4 Stanford (Pac-12) vs. Fresno State (MWC)**
No. 5 Baylor (Big 12) vs. Central Florida (AAC)*
No. 6 Alabama (at-large) vs. No. 11 Oklahoma (at-large)*
No. 7 Ohio State (at-large) vs. No. 10 Clemson (at-large)*
No. 8 South Carolina (at-large) vs. No. 9 Oregon (at-large)**
South Carolina just edged Missouri for the last at-large spot from the SEC because it won head-to-head and had a much better out-of-conference schedule.
|3||4||Michigan State||Big Ten|
|7||7||Ohio State||Big Ten*|
|13||20||Fresno State||Mountain West|
Based on results from actual games (*), use of transitive property (**) and simulation (***), these would've been the quarterfinal matchups. We decided to use an NFL-style format where the highest-seeded team always plays the lowest-seeded team instead of using a rigid bracket:
Quarterfinals (campus sites)
No. 1 Florida State vs. No. 12 Central Florida***
No. 2 Auburn vs. No. 11 Oklahoma**
No. 3 Michigan State vs. No. 10 Clemson**
No. 4 Stanford vs. No. 9 Oregon*
Would you be OK with OU winning 2013 title?
The winning teams then would take a week off before heading to the Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl for the semifinal games:
No. 1 Florida State vs. No. 11 Oklahoma (Sugar Bowl)**
No. 3 Michigan State vs. No. 4 Stanford (Rose Bowl)*
No. 3 Michigan State vs. No. 11 Oklahoma (AT&T Stadium)**
The Sooners, pulling off a string of upsets thanks to the hot hand of freshman quarterback Trevor Knight, advanced to the national championship game in Arlington ... er, North Texas. In the same JerryWorld where UConn's basketball team completed its improbable run, OU would upstage Michigan State for its own national title.
Is this a just outcome? You decide. Vote in our poll and comment below.
Follow on Twitter @ThePlayoffGuru