Why Dallas Cowboys Absolutely Must Extend WR Dez Bryant's Contract

Jonathan Bales@thecowboystimesAnalyst IFebruary 11, 2014

Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant (88) finds running room after grabbing  a pass as Philadelphia Eagles cornerback Cary Williams (26) gives chase during the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 29, 2013, in Arlington, Texas. (AP Photo/Tim Sharp)
Tim Sharp/Associated Press

Wide receiver Dez Bryant is the most valuable player on the Dallas Cowboys not named "Tony Romo," and it isn't even close. With all of the salary-cap trouble the Cowboys have had, their top priority needs to be re-signing Bryant.

In today's NFL, wide receivers are more important than ever. As valuable as offensive linemen are to a quarterback's success, you could argue a big, play-making receiver is even more vital. Quarterbacks are getting the ball out quicker than ever, as evidenced by their time spent in the pocket, recorded by Pro Football Focus (subscription required). That decreases the value of linemen and increases that of pass-catchers.

Furthermore, Bryant is a scarce player. It's not like the Cowboys can go out and find another receiver with his combination of size and ball skills. His skill set is irreplaceable.

Most people seem to understand that the Cowboys should re-sign Bryant, but few understand his worth. The guys at DallasCowboys.com discussed if the 'Boys should re-sign Bryant or left tackle Tyron Smith. The answer is both, but it raises an interesting question: Is Smith more valuable to Dallas than Bryant?

While we all know Bryant is a premiere wide receiver, I suspect many would either be torn on that proposition or side with Smith because of "how much more valuable the line is than wide receivers." That might be the case for certain receivers, but not those who score at an astonishing rate. Let's take a look at Bryant's value to Dallas.


Dez vs. Megatron

Lions wide receiver Calvin Johnson is the best receiver in the NFL. But the gap between Megatron and Bryant perhaps isn't as great as you might think.

On a per-route basis, Bryant's first few years in the league have been comparable to Johnson's.

Jonathan Bales

I removed the receivers' rookie years (which were very comparable) to judge them as they entered their career primes. Johnson broke out before Bryant in his second NFL season, but Bryant is right there with Johnson on a per-route basis.

You could argue that Megatron has seen a lot more double coverage than Bryant, but that's probably offset by the number of targets he's seen. Johnson's yards-per-route average is surely inflated from getting such a heavy workload; he's averaged over 148 targets per year since entering the NFL, compared to only 118 for Bryant.


Touchdown Scoring Ability

Bryant gets the ball into the end zone. NFL coaches (Jason Garrett included) seem to forget that the point of football is to score touchdowns. Yes, you need to move the ball up the field in order to do that, but teams that can consistently score touchdowns when they're inside the red zone are going to win.

Both Bryant and Johnson are elite red-zone players. As much as Johnson surpasses Bryant in many aspects of wide receiver play, you could argue that Bryant is the superior red-zone threat. Going back to his time at Oklahoma State, Bryant has been one of the most efficient red-zone receivers ever.

Looking at overall touchdown rate (the percentage of catches that result in touchdowns) in Years 2-4, Bryant has kept pace with Megatron. 

Jonathan Bales

The Cowboys had a superior offense during the years studied, but take a look at the receivers' career numbers for both touchdown rate and red-zone touchdown rate.

Jonathan Bales

Johnson's numbers are well above average, but Bryant has been perhaps the best red-zone receiver in the NFL since he entered the league. He's scored on 24 of his 58 red-zone targets.

Furthermore, Bryant has extra value in Dallas because the team isn't loaded with red-zone talent. The team has high hopes for second-year tight end Gavin Escobar, but there are no other dominant red-zone forces in Dallas. If Bryant were to go elsewhere, who would consistently put the ball into the end zone?

Bryant is not the best wide receiver in the NFL, but he's not that far off. 



The primary mistake the Cowboys have made in re-signing their own talent is "rewarding" players for what they've done as opposed to paying them for what they'll do in the future. In the case of Bryant, though, there's good reason to think his best days are ahead of him.

I charted historic wide receiver efficiency (in terms of yards per route) by age.

Jonathan Bales

Bryant will enter the 2014 season at age 25, which is one year before the career peak for most wide receivers. Most receivers have been able to sustain a high level of play (above 90 percent of their career peak) into their early 30s.

That means the Cowboys can hand Bryant a long-term deal and not fear his production tailing off near the end of it. Even if the 'Boys want to ink Bryant for seven more seasons, he'd still be just 31 years old when the contract ends.

The Cowboys still have Bryant under contract for one more year, but they need to do what they can to lock him up as soon as they can. He's an absolutely vital part of their future and, despite being widely considered an elite wide receiver, still one of the most underappreciated players in Dallas.