NBA Trade Rumors: Boston Celtics Would Be Foolish to Move Kevin Garnett
According to Mark Kiszla of The Denver Post, the long-time NBA veteran has said that he has no interest in the Nuggers, but Kiszla still asserts that a deal for the veteran could happen before the trade deadline:
Through his representatives, Garnett has let it be known he has no current interest in the Nuggets. Don't be surprised, however, if Garnett is gone from Boston before the league's Feb. 21 trade deadline. And that's why the Nuggets must continue to monitor the situation.
No matter where Boston sits in the standings at the trade deadline or finishes the 2012-13 regular season, the Celtics are better in the long run retaining Garnett through the remainder of his contract.
The 36-year-old, 17-year NBA veteran provides as much to the Boston organization off the court with his leadership and work ethic as he does on it, but that doesn’t mean he can’t still play efficiently.
Garnett is averaging 15.1 points and 7.4 rebounds per game this year, and with the season-ending injuries to both point guard Rajon Rondo and rookie forward Jared Sullinger, the Celtics have continued to lean more and more on the veteran as the season progresses.
Should the Boston Celtics trade Kevin Garnett?
The Celtics way.
Sullinger is a smart player with a ton of raw talent, but the polish that playing alongside and under the tutelage of a legend like Garnett is an intangible that can’t be measured through statistics.
If Garnett’s numbers start to slip dramatically or he begins to miss long periods of time to nagging injuries, Boston would be stuck with his pricey contract and would not get anything of value back for the veteran.
As serious as that risk is, the reward of keeping him on the roster for three more seasons is 100 percent worth it.
Garnett is the heart and soul of the Celtics, and as Rondo and Sullinger return to the lineup next season, the team will once again try to win an NBA Championship.
KG must be one of the centerpieces of that effort.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?