Lakers News: Potential Return of L.A. Big Men Will Help Slumping Lakers
The Lakers’ medical staff will reportedly re-evaluate the two ailing big men prior to the team’s matchup against the Cleveland Cavaliers on Sunday night, according to Dave McMenamin of ESPN Los Angeles.
Gasol (concussion) and Howard (torn labrum, right shoulder) have missed the team’s last three games, and L.A. has lost each of those contests.
Another report by McMenamin labeled both Howard and Gasol as game-time decisions for the Sunday clash against Cleveland.
Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports
The combined six-game losing streak has put them five games out of playoff contention and prompted some negativity from team legend Magic Johnson.
While Johnson’s sentiment is shared by many fans, it’s a little too early for doom and gloom.
Regardless, negativity is at an all-high in the City of Angels. Even diehard celebrity enthusiast Jack Nicholson walked out on his team during their Staples Center spanking by the Oklahoma City Thunder on Jan. 11.
USA TODAY Sports
Let’s not even get started on their defensive woes.
Point guard Steve Nash isn’t entirely optimistic that having the two back will help the team initially. He told McMenamin that it’s tough to operate with both Howard and Gasol on the court:
The fact of the matter, it's tough to get inside to him when Dwight and him are on the floor together. To Pau's credit, he can stretch the floor more than Dwight and he's more of a playmaker, so sometimes he's going to find himself on the perimeter.
One thing is certain: A blowout like the one the Thunder laid on the Lakers is not acceptable, and the team desperately needs its top two big men back in the lineup.
L.A. would still benefit from having its best bigs back despite Nash’s skepticism and the team’s struggles this season.
If Mike D’Antoni needs to change his scheme to accommodate his big men and Nash’s needs, then he needs to do that.
But having them back on the court, in any capacity, will be an improvement over the recent struggles we’ve seen in their absence.
That’s for sure.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?