Vikings vs. Packers: Lights Too Bright on Big Stage for Webb and the Vikings
I expected a letdown by the Minnesota Vikings on Saturday.
The uneven play through the middle of the season prepared us for that possibility.
Nobody expected this near-disaster.
Joe Webb was a complete mess for 90 percent of the night, holding the ball far too long and twice throwing the ball haphazardly into the air mid-sack and nearly being picked off.
If you thought that by the end of the night Minnesota would have a quarterback controversy, you can shelve that thought.
Webb was awful—and we saw why Christian Ponder wasn't benched during the awful stretch he had midseason.
What was really puzzling was the game plan by Minnesota.
Webb is not a pocket quarterback. He never will be, because it's not his strength and that's fine.
If you have Webb, who is incredibly slippery when running the option, why do you force him to hang in the pocket all night?
It was like the Vikings decided to run an offense the exact same way they would with Ponder under center.
The question before the game was, "Did the Packers prepare for Joe Webb?"
What the question should have been was, "Did the Vikings?"
For an offense that had its backup take the majority of the snaps during the week in practice, this unit looked like it didn't have any idea how to use that player.
Yes, the defense had issues in the game. The lack of tackling skill—especially in the backfield going after Rodgers—burned them as much as the man coverage they couldn't pull off against the Packers' very good group of wide receivers.
They couldn't stop the Packers in any phase of the game, and while no single Green Bay player lit them up, as a team the offense just overpowered the Vikings defense.
He didn't play though, and it was clear that much to everyone's surprise, the team missed him tremendously.
Check out the B/R NFC North Facebook page. Like us and keep up with everything NFC North on Bleacher Report.
Follow me on Twitter at @andrew_garda.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?