NHL Lockout 2012: What to Watch for as Latest CBA Talks Continue in New York
Resumption of CBA talks expected to begin at 1 p.m. in NYC.— Darren Dreger (@DarrenDreger) November 7, 2012
As for the meeting on Tuesday, Louis Jean of TVA Sports was able to provide some information on how the talks went.
Source tells me on negotiations: "It's going well and having some very positive conversations and exchanges". #CBA— Louis Jean (@LouisJean_TVA) November 7, 2012
Make Whole expected to be main focus today. How the owners intend on covering some or all is unclear. Huge issue. Big mystery.— Darren Dreger (@DarrenDreger) November 7, 2012
Make Whole is tricky. Will be much debate among owners. Will it be covered by the league or individual owners? Much to discuss and decide.— Darren Dreger (@DarrenDreger) November 7, 2012
If a common ground can be found on the make whole provision then we could see a deal in the next week or so. That's how important of a topic this is for the two sides to discuss on Wednesday.
If the owners budge on the provision and satisfy the players' demands of having their existing contracts honored, then the NHLPA will have to make a few concessions on player contracts.
There's no question that the league is trying to get rid of the huge, cap-circumventing contracts that many players were offered and agreed to during the previous CBA.
Eliminating these types of contracts would likely result in term limits, which isn't something the players will easily agree to if their share of hockey-related revenue (HRR) goes down to 50-50 right away.
However, as long as the owners don't propose major changes to player contract issues such as salary arbitration, term limits and entry-level deals, this part of the negotiations shouldn't be a major stumbling block in getting a deal done.
The make whole provision and player contract rights will likely be at the forefront of Wednesday's meetings and will be the two issues to watch moving forward. Once these are taken care of, it might not be long before a new agreement is made and the NHL lockout ends.
Fans must not get too optimistic until more progress is made, but the fact that the league and its players are willing to meet on back-to-back days and discuss the provision is encouraging.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?