NFL Rumors: Baltimore Ravens Extending Michael Oher Now Would Be a Mistake
Michael Oher's story is one that has warmed the hearts of football fans all across the continent.
Heck, it was made into a major motion picture starring Sandra Bullock.
There's no doubt that the 26-year-old offensive lineman has shown an incredible amount of resilience throughout his life.
This, however, is not enough to earn him a fresh new contract.
Not just yet, anyway.
According to Aaron Wilson of the Baltimore Sun, it seems like preliminary discussions have begun to extend the Memphis native's tenure in Baltimore.
After being selected in the first round of the NFL draft in 2009 by the Ravens, Oher has shown an incredible amount of promise, but he has had a hard time translating that potential into on-field success.
He's been shifted around on the offensive line and has consistently struggled to protect Ravens QB Joe Flacco.
In seven games so far this season, Oher has allowed two sacks, 13 quarterback pressures and has taken four penalties.
While he may still emerge as a staple of Batimore's offensive line, there is no need to rush into re-signing Oher, as he's signed through this season and next.
Do you think it would be wrong to ask Michael Oher to finish out his contract before extending him, given his track record?
Why not use the remainder of the time on his contract to evaluate what they have?
Why not allow Oher's contract year to drive him to improve his game?
Sure, it may not be the most professional of moves, but it's not like Oher has earned a lengthy contract extension.
Not to mention, he already seems committed to a future in Baltimore if the team wants him.
In the article linked above, Oher has the following to say regarding his future in Baltimore:
I love it here...It's a great organization, great city. I would love to finish out here. That's up to the organization. Without a doubt my ears are open.
Fellow lineman Marshal Yanda indicated that Oher is a hard worker and positive influence in the dressing room.
Taking all that into consideration, it would definitely be in the Ravens' best interest to at least see how Oher plays the remainder of his contract out before committing to him for an extended period.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?