Tale of the Tape: Andrew Luck Dominates in Preseason Debut for Colts
Newsflash: Andrew Luck is a very good quarterback.
Nothing new, right? Before the 2012 NFL draft most sane people agreed that Luck was a rare prospect for a college quarterback, and many proclaimed him to be the best overall prospect they had seen. Now that Luck's first NFL game is in the books, let's take a look at three traits that separate No. 12 from the rookie quarterbacks we've seen over the last decade.
As a former quarterbacks coach, nothing was more important to me than where the ball was placed when thrown. A strong arm can get you out of a lot of bad situations, but if the ball isn't being delivered in a catchable area, strength doesn't matter.
If Luck can continue to throw the ball with this much command, he'll have ample time to work on improving his ability to read a defense and perfect the small details of the game.
The advent of the spread passing game has inflated college quarterbacks' numbers and made passing the ball into open spaces easier, but it's also been a disaster when preparing them for the NFL. In a spread passing attack at the college level, quarterbacks are generally receiving a play call from the coaches on the sidelines and making a very fast throw to a predetermined read.
That doesn't happen in the NFL, which is why we see rookie quarterbacks bailing in the pocket and making poor reads early on.
Luck acclimated very well, partially because of the pro-style system he ran at Stanford. The video below shows Luck's ability to move around in the pocket to avoid the pass rush.
Luck looked like a veteran in the pocket against the St. Louis Rams' pass rush.
One preseason game isn't enough to crown Luck as a Top 10 NFL quarterback, but his first outing did reinforce much of what evaluators and scouts saw during his college career at Stanford. If Luck can build on this game, his first season will be a brilliant success.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?