Heat vs. Pacers: Udonis Haslem and Dexter Pittman Suspended for Game 5
Miami Heat players Dexter Pittman and Udonis Haslem have been suspended for their flagrant fouls in Game 5 of their series with the Indiana Pacers. The league has suspended Pittman for three games and Haslem for one.
ESPN's Brian Windhorst spread the word on Twitter.
The NBA has suspended Udonis Haslem for one game and Dexter Pittman for 3 games.— Brian Windhorst (@WindhorstESPN) May 23, 2012
Pittman's foul came with just 19.4 seconds remaining in Miami's Game 5 blowout win. Pittman slid across the lane and buried his forearm into the chin of Lance Stephenson.
Check out the foul, and it becomes clear why this suspension was mandatory.
This series has been filled with increasingly rough play. Haslem levied his hard foul on Tyler Hansbrough not long after Hansbrough bloodied Dwyane Wade with a blow to the head.
Here is what earned Haslem the suspension.
Pittman clearly deserved the more severe punishment for his blatant headhunting of the Pacers' Stephenson.
Haslem's foul, while intentional, at least was attached to an attempt to make a play on the ball; Pittman's was not.
With the game in hand, Pittman was not concerned in any way about making a play on the ball. He saw Stephenson charging into the lane and lined him up for a cheap shot.
After the foul, Pittman could even be caught winking.
Is a three-game suspension for Pittman the right call?
There is no room for this kind of behavior in sports, and the action is going to cost Pittman three games. Pittman's absence will be felt with Haslem on the pine for next game, as the Heat's frontcourt will be missing the suspended pair and forward Chris Bosh.
However, in the following two games, it will not be a major detriment.
Pittman has appeared in just two games during the playoffs and is averaging 3.5 minutes in those games.
Hopefully, the league will announce a monetary fine to go along with the suspension. Given Pittman's lack of on-court impact, the suspension is not a sufficient punishment.
A player can't be free to headhunt like this without facing severe consequences.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?