Seeds of Change in Raiders Front Office Are Bearing Some Fruit
We’re 88 days away from the 2009 NFL draft as this article is being written. The Raiders are drafting in the top ten, again, which isn’t surprising. Every year at this time, team needs as well as team priorities for every franchise are mentioned, in addition to the one million mock drafts that are everywhere.
What it surprising is the fact that if you were to look at these items for the Raiders for the last two seasons, the needs are basically identical; with the only difference being the team has their franchise quarterback.
A quarterback is only as good his offensive line and wide receivers. The team needs for the Raiders prior to the 2008 NFL draft were defensive tackle, safety, offensive tackle, wide receiver and cornerback. One year later the team has the exact same needs.
These holes need to be filled through the draft and the Raiders need to resist the temptation of bringing in several free agents, which has been the plan in the past, and develop their young players.
The Raiders possess one of the smallest scouting staffs in the league, although that staff was bolstered in 2007 with the hiring of Rich Snead, the former Titans director of player personnel. This is his second stint with the organization as he worked for the Raiders 1990-1993. He now serves as Al Davis' eyes and ears, but as always Davis will have the final say on anything Raiders.
There were two other additions to the Personnel department George Streeter and Keith Rowen. The moves added new blood to the scouting department and gave the Raiders five individuals with 20-plus seasons of experience. However, George Streeter was dismissed during the 2008 offseason.
These hires are huge because it not only helps the team draft better talent but it is also proof that Davis seems to realize that he needs help, especially when it comes to evaluating talent.
Snead’s contributions are evident in the last two drafts, but make no mistake—no one is going to tell Davis what to do. He has the unenviable task of showing Davis who will improve the team’s performance on the field from a talent standpoint.
It is a known fact that a team's not going to hit on every pick. That just doesn’t happen, but the additions mentioned have at least raised the Raiders batting average.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?