Chelsea vs. Barcelona: Tactical Analysis of the Blues' Champions League Win
Luck was on Chelseaās side as they secured a 1-0 win over Barcelona in the first leg of the UEFA Champions League semi-finals.Ā
Chelsea were dogged in defence and whilst they conceded 24 shots, they managed to keep a clean sheet.Ā
Alexis SÔnchez and Pedro were denied by the woodwork whilst Cesc Fà bregas and Sergio Busquets should have scored.
Here's a tactical analysis of Chelsea's performance.
5. Should Chelsea Abandon the Offside Trap?
1 of 5Cesc FĆ bregasā angled pass found AndrĆ©s Iniesta, who played a 1-2 with Lionel Messi and then dinked the ball over Chelseaās back four to Alexis SĆ”nchezāwho hit the crossbar.
Three Chelsea players are at fault for this play: Frank Lampard, Juan Mata and Ashley Cole.
Lampard passed the ball straight to FĆ bregas after Cole had intercepted Dani Alvesā pass. Mata should have been marking Iniesta. Cole played the offside trap a few seconds too late, allowing Alexis to latch onto Iniestaās brilliant passābut fortune favoured Chelsea.
The lesson learned from this play is that you live and die by the offside trap.
So why play it?
Chelsea needs to sit deep, stay on their feet and let BarƧa pass the ball sideways 300 times.
However the Blues cannot give BarƧa a window of opportunity to split their defence open.
Roberto Di Matteoās men need to respect the vision and passing ability of Xavi, Messi, Iniesta and FĆ bregas.Ā
4. Attacking Dani Alves
2 of 5Lionel Messi completed 92 percent of his passes last night, but he turned straight into Frank Lampard, who tore Barcelonaās defence open with a brilliant diagonal ball to Ramires.
Two issues for Pep Guardiola to ponder: 1) Where was Dani Alves? 2) Why was Javier Mascherano marking air?
Ramires squared the ball up to Didier Drogba, whose goal cemented his starting position in the second leg.
Drogba took advantage of Adriano being caught out of position and Mascherano being in la la land.
Guardiola needs to weigh up the pros and cons of Alves playing as anĀ auxiliaryĀ wide forward.Ā
In several El ClĆ”sicos, Alves proved to the world that when he wants to defend, he can be world class by shutting down Cristiano Ronaldo.Ā
Though I suspectĀ Guardiola instructedĀ Alves to stay back becauseĀ Xabi Alonso kept playing diagonal long balls attacking the vacant space left by Alves.Ā
IfĀ Alves continues to disregard his defensive positioning, Chelsea have a way out by sending long balls behind him toĀ Ramires.Ā
3. Chelsea's Achilles' Heel: José Bosingwa
3 of 5Chelsea wasted £16.2 million on José Bosingwa, whose defending is atrocious.
Branislav IvanoviÄ shifted toward the centre because Sergio Busquetsā back heel cut open Chelseaās defence.
It should be common sense for Bosingwa to move to the right to fill IvanoviÄās spotāregardless if there is a Barcelona player in sight.
The fact that Pedro was there and Bosingwa failed to get anywhere near him is an indictment on the Portugueseās low football IQ.
Thankfully for Chelsea, Pedro hit the post instead of scoring a pivotal away goalāa la AndrĆ©s Iniesta two years ago.Ā
Moral of the story: leave Bosingwa on the bench.Ā
2. David Luiz or Gary Cahill?
4 of 5Readers who are familiar with my articles know my abrasive stance against Gary Cahill, but he was excellent last night. Ā Ā
Cahillās tackling is his major weaknessāhe only averages 0.7 tackles per gameābut itās an advantage by default against Barcelona.
Itās imperative that he stays on his feet until a BarƧa player shoots, because if he goes to ground too early and gets burned, Chelsea will probably concedeāunless BarƧa continue to squander gilt-edged opportunities.
Last night, he readĀ Lionel Messi like a book and blocked two of the Argentine's shots.
David Luiz would have hacked Messi, but Cahill wasĀ disciplinedĀ and flung his body at Messi's shots with great timing. Ā
He made three crucial blocks and cleared the ball six times.
Roberto Di Matteo should start Cahill over Luiz in the second leg.Ā
1. Should Juan Mata Start in the Second Leg?
5 of 5| Ā | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocked Shots | Fouls |
| Ashley Cole | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Branislav IvanoviÄ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Frank Lampard | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Gary Cahill | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| John Obi Mikel | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| John Terry | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Juan Mata | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ramires | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Raul Meireles | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
Chelsea only had 21 percent of possession and made 605 fewer passes thanĀ Barcelona.Ā
Roberto Di Matteo's instructions were clear: park the bus in front of goals, remainĀ disciplinedĀ in the tackle (Meireles must have been in the toilet whenĀ Di Matteo said that) and keep the defensive shape for the entire game.Ā
Why wasn't Mata markingĀ AndrĆ©s Iniesta when Chelsea didn't have possession?Ā
Iniesta received the ball, played a 1-2 withĀ Lionel Messi and, if not for the crossbar, would have provided an assist forĀ Alexis SĆ”nchez.Ā
Di Matteo has no desire to play possession football in the second leg, so it makes sense to startĀ Michael Essien over Mata.
Please readĀ 8 Players Who Could Move to Bigger Clubs After Euros.Ā
Statistics courtesy of WhoScored.com.Ā









.png?w=3840)




