Jacoby Ellsbury Injured? As Boston's Best CF in 60 Years, Red Sox Sure Hope Not
Jacoby Ellsbury: This post might contain the first-ever mention of Dom DiMaggio at Bleacher Report.
J. Meric/Getty Images
Just how good was Jacoby Ellsbury last year? By at least one measure he was the best Red Sox outfielder of the last 62 years. As we wait to find out how long Ellsbury will be out after today’s shoulder injury (if at all), consider just how hard a player of his caliber would be to replace.
The Red Sox faced this same issue in 2010, when Ellsbury lost almost the entire season to five broken ribs, but he had yet to play at the level he did in 2011.
Wins Above Replacement depicts how many wins a player contributed over and above what would have been supplied by a “replacement-level” player, usually defined as being a Triple-A veteran or player who would be freely available on the waiver wire.
Using this kind of measure, we can compare players across time. For the purposes of this exercise, I’m using Baseball Prospectus’s sortable WARP engine. All of the stats are the ones you would expect with the exception of Fielding Runs Above Average (FRAA), which attempts to measure how many runs a player saved with his glove. Here is the top 15, Truman-Eisenhower years and up:
# | YEAR | NAME | AB | R | H | HR | RBI | BB | SB | FRAA | AVG | OBP | SLG | WARP |
1 | 2011 | J. Ellsbury | 660 | 119 | 212 | 32 | 105 | 52 | 39 | 11.6 | .321 | .376 | .552 | 8.6 |
2 | 1979 | F. Lynn | 531 | 116 | 177 | 39 | 122 | 82 | 2 | 4 | .333 | .423 | .637 | 8.1 |
3 | 1970 | R.Smith | 580 | 109 | 176 | 22 | 74 | 51 | 10 | 12.5 | .303 | .361 | .497 | 6.5 |
4 | 1971 | R. Smith | 618 | 85 | 175 | 30 | 96 | 63 | 11 | 6.2 | .283 | .352 | .489 | 6.1 |
5 | 1969 | R. Smith | 543 | 87 | 168 | 25 | 93 | 54 | 7 | 9.3 | .309 | .368 | .527 | 6 |
6 | 1956 | J. Piersall | 601 | 91 | 176 | 14 | 87 | 58 | 7 | 14 | .293 | .350 | .449 | 5.7 |
7 | 2004 | J. Damon | 621 | 123 | 189 | 20 | 94 | 76 | 19 | 9.4 | .304 | .380 | .477 | 5.5 |
8 | 2005 | J. Damon | 624 | 117 | 197 | 10 | 75 | 53 | 18 | 12.4 | .316 | .366 | .439 | 5.5 |
9 | 1973 | R. Smith | 423 | 79 | 128 | 21 | 69 | 68 | 3 | 7.7 | .303 | .398 | .515 | 5.4 |
10 | 1975 | F. Lynn | 528 | 103 | 175 | 21 | 105 | 62 | 10 | -7.3 | .331 | .401 | .566 | 5.4 |
11 | 1968 | R. Smith | 558 | 78 | 148 | 15 | 69 | 64 | 22 | 3.3 | .265 | .342 | .430 | 5.3 |
12 | 1964 | C. Yastrzemski | 567 | 77 | 164 | 15 | 67 | 75 | 6 | 13.3 | .289 | .374 | .451 | 5.2 |
13 | 1950 | D. Dimaggio | 588 | 131 | 193 | 7 | 70 | 82 | 15 | 6.7 | .328 | .414 | .452 | 5.1 |
14 | 1988 | E. Burks | 540 | 93 | 159 | 18 | 92 | 62 | 25 | 2.2 | .294 | .367 | .481 | 4.7 |
15 | 1976 | F. Lynn | 507 | 76 | 159 | 10 | 65 | 48 | 14 | 0.8 | .314 | .367 | .467 | 4.6 |
A few quick notes:
1. It’s always good to be reminded of how good a player Reggie Smith was. A switch-hitter with power, patience, and speed, he could do a bit of everything. Due to injuries his career didn’t have the long wind-down that might have given him bigger career numbers, but he was better than any number of Hall of Famers.
2. Another reminder: the incompetence of the Heywood Sullivan-Buddy LeRoux-managed front office that cost the Red Sox both Carlton Fisk and Fred Lynn during the 1980-1981 offseason. Lynn had his injury problems, but he was made for Fenway, with career averages of .350/.423/.608 there. How do you screw that up? A: By not sending him a contract, that’s how.
3. Yaz really did get one year of center field play early in his career due to Gary Geiger’s forced retirement due to stomach problems.
Maybe the Sox should have gone harder after Yoenis Cespedes. Again, we have yet to learn Ellsbury’s ultimate fate, and even if the Sox were loaded with outfield prospects, you can’t easily replace a six- or eight-win player. It’s scary just how good Ellsbury was in 2011—and how much his loss might hurt in 2012.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?



2 Comments
Loading comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete