"For me not making top four would be a disaster because I want to play with the best. We want to play in the Champions League, and anything else would not be good enough."
However, watching his team lose 2-1 to the supposedly "weak" Manchester United team, it simply seemed that Wenger was talking the talk but doing nothing to walk the walk.
In a match that was touted to be a measure of how far Arsenal had come since their 8-2 drubbing at the hands of United in August last year, Arsenal were lucky to not have conceded eight goals again.
Throughout the match, the mix of indignation and muted disbelief was palpable at the Emirates.
Why did Wenger take off Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain—Arsenal's best player—at the time he was most needed?
Why was Theo Walcott instead left on the pitch, despite being so clearly inept and ineffective?
Why bring on Andrei Arshavin, who has been nothing but useless for the last six months?
This was the first time in five years that Arsenal had lost three league games in a row, but it's not the fact that Arsenal lost to United that is the issue—it's the manner of the defeat.
It was a deserved victory for Manchester United, as they were the better team all around. However, that's hardly the sort of reaction Arsenal's fans should be having, right?
In fact, Arsenal's only hope at this stage is that hopefully Arshavin never represents Arsenal again, Wenger starts throwing some money into his team and Robin Van Persie remains blind enough to see Arsenal's viability as a top club.
Like the new article format? Send us feedback!