WWE Monday Night Raw: When Did Raw Become a Live Infomercial?
How did this happen?
How did one of the most anticipated RAWs in the last couple of months turn into a live advertisement? How did we get a show that had more mentions of Twitter than actual matches?
I love the great one, and I personally can say I enjoyed the 20 or so minutes out of the three hours that he was on the showā¦that was essentially supposed to be his.
TOP NEWS
.jpg)
Grading WWE NXT š¢

What's Next For Sami Zayn?

WWE Blows It with Punk Win, More Raw Fallout š£ļø
I did enjoy him saving, and I literally mean saving, that terrible āthis is your lifeā segment without ever having to say a word. I found entertainment in him giving a beating to The Miz and R-Truth, although I think it hurt their characters considerably for the event.
I did not enjoy the ātrending topicsā line that was thrown around; the mention of Twitter, WWE '12, Maxim and Hombre and the constant nods to the WWE shop during nearly every segment or match the entire night.
I used to always wonder how much bigger The Rock would have been if social media was as big as it is now in the 1990s. I now realize how much I would have hated it. Can you imagine Rock or any of the other major āAttitude Eraā stars pushing products like what was pushed tonight? And I hate to bring up the āAttitude Era," itās done, I get that, but it's RAWsĀ like the most recent where itās so easy to see why people just canāt let that era go.
I wasnāt really that bothered by the mentions of magazines, as it was only once during the show, although Iām pretty sure Kelly Kellyās promo for her upcoming magazine cover was actually longer than her match.
But I didnāt need to see a promo about WWE '12. It was barely OK when Santino and Zach Ryder were clearly advertising the pre-order bonus, but essentially that was only because it worked in the form of the whole āwhose side are you onā type of campaign.Ā Every sport does it (Kobe/LeBron, Manning/Brady, Pacquiao/Mayweather, etc.) so itās not out of the ordinary.
But for WWE to actually take time out of the broadcast when so much had already been spent on commercials was overkill. No one is going to just decide to buy the game because you show it on your program. Even young kids today research and watch video previews on games coming out.
Iām all for advertising your extra products, but not when it gets in the way of their main product. After all, thatās what commercials are for. Ā
The nods to the WWE gear also got pretty redundant.
I get itāZach Ryder has new gear, Rock has a new shirt and Cena needs more shirts sold.Ā Yes, Mark Henry and Big Show have pretty cool-looking shirts. Thatās cool too. Iām fine with marketing that, but the jokes donāt have to center around that, and the camera doesnāt have to keep a close-up of the shirt.
Iām going to get The Rockās shirt because I like it, not because you mentioned it.
I saw what Mark Henryās shirt said. Itās nice. It gets the point across. I didnāt need a close-up of it during his entire entrance.
That being said, that is subjective. Some people may not have found that distracting or bad at all. Heck, some may not have noticed.
But the Twitter talk, we all noticed that. John Laurinaitis, CM Punk, Mick Foley, Michael Cole, The Rock, John Cena and the WWE "Did You Know" segments, it was most of the show.
Twitter was mentioned so many times that it gave you the feeling that Twitter just came in and paid WWE to advertise. Laurinaitis talking about it was lame and Cole always talking about it was disgusting.
Iām sorry, but Iām glad Twitter wasnāt around during The Rockās time because as badass of a guy as that Rock is, even he sounds lame talking about ātrending topics."
This is what doesnāt make sense to me in todayās WWE. They advertise more for everything else than their actual main product, the shows and PPVs.
If anything, the WWE needed to use a lot of the wasted time on RAW to advertise for Survivor Series. Better matches, if not more matches, could have occurred.Ā Better and more drawn out story lines could have taken place.
Instead all we got was a couple of singles matches between the two main teams, that ended up seeing each other later that night anyways, a lame (unsurprising) hyped-up match for the Divas Championship and a forced heel strengthening match for Henry and Del Rio.
Oh, and we canāt forget the shots Rock and Cena took at each other before completely burying The Miz and R-Truth.
Itās at the point where if something major doesnāt happen in Survivor Series, like Barrettās team winning or Cena going heel, it will make one of WWEās major PPVs not worth it.
Many already have claimed Royal Rumble and WrestleMania to be not worth it, with SummerSlam getting the only positive nod.
For a company that has 13 PPVs a year, with four of them being considered major, you think WWE would know by now how much should be put into these shows.
I can only hope that WWE has an amazing show in the form of Survivor Series. The Rock and Cena are too good to miss, but I just canāt help but feel a little underwhelmed with the buildup that has taken place for this show. I can only find it sad that so much went into talking about other products, especially Twitter, that we ended up getting a wasteful three-hour Raw.
Twitter is cool and all, but I donāt want to read about feudsāI want to see them.
I donāt believe Cena is going to go heel, nor do I think that Wade Barrettās team is going to win or that Big Show and Henry will actually have a good match.
That being said, Iām starting to think that one thing, if not all of those things, needs to happen for Survivor Series to be considered good, even with the great one on the card. Ā
-(1).jpg)



.jpg)






.jpg)