NCAA Football Recruiting: Does It Really Matter?
With this year’s signing day less than week away, the question comes to mind: Will it be much of the same, or are we in for something else?
I have broken down the past six years of recruiting, according to Rivals.com, noting the top ten recruiting classes and the final poll for the respective year in order to see the impact of recruiting in college football.
Is recruiting that important? Well, let us just allow the results to tell us the impact and outcome of recruiting.
The following shows the recruiting, final position for those teams, and the final Associated Press (AP) top 10 polls following the National Championship game for the past six years:
Recruiting Final Position AP Final Top 10
- Texas 6 Ohio State
- Tennessee NR Miami
- Georgia 3 Georgia
- Florida State 21 USC
- Ohio State 1 Oklahoma
- Auburn 14 Texas
- Oklahoma 5 Kansas
- Miami 2 Iowa
- UCLA NR Michigan
- Colorado NR Washington State
- LSU 2 USC
- Florida 24 LSU
- USC 1 Oklahoma
- Oklahoma 3 Ohio State
- Miami 5 Miami
- Georgia 7 Michigan
- NC State NR Georgia
- South Carolina NR Iowa
- Mississippi State NR Washington State
- Texas A&M NR Miami (Ohio)
- USC 1 USC
- LSU 16 Auburn
- Florida State 15 Oklahoma
- Miami 11 Utah
- Michigan 14 Texas
- Georgia 7 Louisville
- Florida NR Georgia
- Oklahoma 3 Iowa
- Ohio State 20 California
- Texas 5 Virginia Tech
- USC 2 Texas
- Florida State 23 USC
- Oklahoma 22 Penn State
- Tennessee NR Ohio State
- Nebraska 24 West Virginia
- Michigan NR LSU
- Miami 17 Virginia Tech
- Texas A&M NR Alabama
- California 25 Notre Dame
- Georgia 10 Georgia
- USC 4 Florida
- Florida 1 Ohio State
- Florida State NR LSU
- Georgia 23 USC
- Texas 13 Boise State
- Penn State 24 Louisville
- LSU 3 Wisconsin
- Notre Dame 17 Michigan
- Oklahoma 11 Auburn
- Auburn 9 West Virginia
- Florida 13 LSU
- USC 3 Georgia
- Tennessee 12 USC
- LSU 1 Missouri
- Texas 10 Ohio State
- South Carolina NR West Virginia
- Auburn 15 Kansas
- Notre Dame NR Oklahoma
- Georgia 2 Virginia Tech
- Alabama NR Boston College & Texas (tied)
Just a note, if you rely heavily upon recruiting stats, seven of the top ten 2007 classes were from the SEC, so watch out for the SEC in ’09 and ’10!
Do you see any trend here?
Well, it may be hard if you are just looking at the top ten classes and final rankings from each year, but there are a few things that stood out to me that I would like to share with you.
In 2002, Texas had the number one recruiting class. Those seniors, in 2005, were National Champions.
If you look at LSU they had the number one class in 2003 and the number two class in 2004. If you factor in the fact that some of those recruited in 2003 were red-shirted, that number one recruiting class became National Champions in 2007.
Just for the sake of argument though, if no seniors were left from that class (and there were), then the number two recruited class of ’04 went on to become National Champions.
The same was true for Florida, the number two recruiting class of 2003, who became champions in that class’ junior/senior year of 2006.
Southern Cal, who had three consecutive number one recruiting classes from 2004-2006, also had consecutive years finishing in the top five.
So if the streak continues with top recruiting classes finishing at the top, the 2008 season may very well be the year for USC to add another notch to their National Championship belt.
Consequently, Georgia, who has finished strong in recruiting the past few years, has done the same during their seasons as well. The only problem with UGA is the fact that they are just right in the middle of the pack—better than mediocre, but not strong enough to finish the job and bring home the biggest glory of college football.
Oklahoma has had similar results, with great recruiting classes and great seasons, yet not quite strong enough to win it all.
A point of irony lies with the Florida State program, which had three consecutive top three classes, but has yet to end the season in the top ten. Miami and Ohio State have both landed outstanding classes, but have yielded disappointment also. (Although the Buckeyes only have themselves to blame for their distress; losing back-to-back championship games.)
Others have had great finishes out of nowhere in the recruiting process, but nothing to show. Some have had great finishes to the year, with “unknown” players and “poor” recruiting according to the experts. These however have been far and few between, such as Boise State in ’06 and Kansas in ’07.
One more note of irony is the fact that West Virginia has finished strong the past three years, all top ten finishes, without top ten recruiting classes. Kudos goes to coaching, underrated player talent, or whatever it was, but the facts remain in the results shown above. Those who recruit strong have positive results.
Over time, given that players do not bolt for the NFL early, great recruiting ultimately results in championships. With all of that being said, the question comes forth: Where will this year’s recruiting classes, with the likes of Florida, Notre Dame, and Alabama at the top, be in three to four years?
.jpg)


.png)


.jpg)





