Trade Demands and Free Agency: How the NHL is Being Run By Its' Players

Bryan Thiel by Senior Writer Written on November 04, 2008
340x_feature

We saw the flashes of it early last season when the defending champion Anaheim Ducks were handcuffed by indifferent returning stars.

We saw what Ray Emery's attitude did to the Ottawa Senators last season.

We started to get a taste of this past offseason when Alexander Radulov up and left without any forewarning to his NHL organization.

Like their professional brethren in throughout baseball, basketball, and football, NHL athletes have decided that they are seemingly above their team's decisions and that it's themselves who in fact control the destiny of the NHL and it's teams.

Years ago, teams would determine if you had a job or not, when, where, and if you would be traded, and whether you would play 5, 10, 15, or 20 minutes a night.

As time moved on however, players decided they need more pull in matters affecting them. All of the sudden superstars started demanding trades, players on the brink of stardom started to pine for more ice time, and backup goalies discontent with their role would tell their employers "play me or trade me".

While we scratched are heads and muttered under our breath at these outrageous claims by these pampered prima-donnas, they continually got what they want, using any means at their disposal.

While some would allow their performance to drop-off drastically and some would refuse to play at all, others played the two biggest cards up their sleeve perfectly to saunter their way to achieving their demands: The media and the fans--both of which go hand in hand.

As professional sports grew in popularity (and money-garnering prospects) from the 1970's to the 1980's to the 1990's, the media grew with it. Granted the idea of a team winning a Superbowl on a last-second field goal wasn't as headline grabbing as a war or a high-profile resignation as Chairman of a multi-billion dollar company (yet), but it was something that you could put in the paper, and grab a handful of customers just at the mere mention of the words "sports section".

With the introduction of beat writers for each and every team and the size of post-game media scrums in dressing rooms growing each year, fans found themselves heading towards a premium for information on their favorite team.

Want to know if your favorite player waxed his eyebrows? There was probably a picture of it somewhere. Want to learn about the soft, shiny hair of your star goalie? Someone was probably writing a piece about it. Interested in whether or not the ambidextrous players on the team got their own bus or not? There was probably an expose coming out on your local TV Station about it soon enough.

But with the growth in the media coverage and the expansion of the common fan's knowledge, the players (while getting stronger and faster) were also getting smarter.

They began to take notes on what the media would and wouldn't print or broadcast. They began to learn that cliches and mundane answers don't sell or get air time. Much like the celebrities they longed to be, they found that smut sold papers, published photos, and wrote stories.

So why not let the muck-raking begin?

With the media searching for the next big story, players would leave a big steaming pile of controversy smoldering in their locker if they were unhappy. They'd rip the organization, the coaches, their fellow players, and even the fans--placing the the "feet that fill the seats" in some of the most dangerous palms known to man.

People in every facet of society have learned to become passionate about whatever they follow--usually to a dangerous extent. While some follow the careers and even stalk movie stars and starlets religiously, others preach, pray, and prosper in the friendly confines of their local arena or field.

Say something great about an organization or it's fans, and you can be immortalized. Say something negative about them, and you'll be sure to hear about it--which is exactly what the athletes learned. The scary thing is, that as long as it took you to read that paragraph, public perception can change just as easily.

But through the media, the blowhorn was put in place for disgruntled athletes to broadcast their message to the masses. They'd badmouth the organization and fans would make their opinion on the matter known--either by showing up and booing, or not showing up at all.

Single Page
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

4 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

327
reads

4
comments

written on November 04, 2008 Opinion

Top Stories from NHL.com

NHL on B/R | Official Partners

The best Coyotes newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.