Sign up or login to track your favorite teams

Sign Up for Bleacher Report

As a registered user you can subscribe to your favorite teams, post comments, write your own articles, and much more.

You must register in order for that functionality to work!








Validating sign up form ...

Bleacher Report articles are written by fans like you

Do you want to cover your favorite sports, teams, and leagues?

Processing writing preferences ...

Great, , you're signed up!

i.e. Big 10, LeBron James, USC Football

Selected Tags:

Logging in ...

It has never been more difficult to get a ticket to professional sports than it is in Boston in 2008. While the Red Sox have sold out every game for four-plus years, things aren't much better with Boston's other teams...

A Plea to MLB: Move the Marlins to Boston

by Evan Brunell (Senior Writer)

4

409 reads

Sports

October 31, 2008


It has never been more difficult to get a ticket to professional sports than it is in Boston in 2008.

While the Red Sox have sold out every game for four-plus years, things aren't much better with Boston's other teams. The Celtics, coming off a championship, have hiked prices and sold out of any seats under $37 (read: not many) on the first day. The Patriots, even with Tom Brady's demise, are going to be selling out games for an awful long time. Even the comparatively lowly Bruins start at $23.50 a game for a student ticket in the nosebleeds and act like it's a great deal.

In short, unlike virtually every other major city in the US, Boston is the only place where you can't walk up to the door of a professional event and purchase tickets for anything less than $50-plus.

Boston's opponent in the ALCS, as a counterpoint, sold upper-deck seats for $9, with free parking if you brought four or more people in the same car. So, for $36 in Tampa Bay, you can get four people a seat. In Fenway, you have to purchase nine months in advance, and it's $20 for a standing-room ticket.

To me, it's incredibly simple: We have the highest demand, so, at the very least, we should have comparative supply. Obviously, every team in the majors is trying to artificially decrease the number of available tickets, but I believe we have reached an untenable situation for Boston sports fans, in which the sheer frustration of never being able to attend any games will eventually sour people on following sports at all.

Everyone has fond stories to tell of their first game, or heading into the park in the summer with their family. As it is now, this situation is nearly impossible.

The Marlins simply do not have a solid foundation in Florida. After two championships in six years, regardless of any excuses, the fans simply don't care. With the legislature dragging its feet in getting taxpayers to give hundreds of millions to an unpopular team (good luck with that one, guys), and Dolphin Stadium being at best a mediocre home to any sport, the Marlins may not be long for Florida.

The other issue is the recession/depression. Florida has been hit harder by foreclosures than Massachusetts and has a larger elderly resident base. When times are tough, it makes sense to consolidate with a known strength. Does anyone really doubt that at least 14,000 Bostonians would go to a game each night, especially if ticket prices are closer to league average than Boston average?

Surely there are obstacles to the Boston Pilgrims. Boston, of course, had two teams up until the Braves moved to Milwaukee, but Boston is a dramatically different city now. Back then, while the Red Sox were still very popular, they weren't the phenomenon they've been over the last decade.

Boston has also evolved from a purely working class city to more of a metropolis, offering more disposable income even during a recession. And, purely statistically, 3,456,063 people lived in the Boston metro area in 1950; as of 2006, it's 4,482,857.

Secondly, funding would be a concern. Until a ballpark could be built, the Fenway Sports Group would, I'm sure, be happy for added revenue by having two teams use Fenway Park. With the number of hi-tech companies in the Boston area, I believe we could work a similar arrangement to that of Metropolitan Stadium around mid-century, where companies treated the team and stadium as an investment, and shared in the profits in exchange for up-front capital.

The other question, of course, is the Red Sox, who surely enjoy their monopoly status. But it would be clear from the start that the Pilgrims would be the second team in Boston, as an addition instead of a replacement to the Red Sox. As a peace offering, much like Peter Angelos and the Nationals a few years back, I believe the Pilgrims should be placed under the NESN banner, allowing FSG to profit off of the second team.

Something simply needs to break when it comes to the current sports landscape. Everyone else in the country can see sports without taking out a loan, and without buying 6-10 months before. Why not us?

Track this Article on My B/R
Flag This Article
Share This Article

4 comments Last one added 8 months ago — Leave a Comment

  1. ...

    I agree. I believe for the sake of a the Marlins lack of fan base, and hence revenue, Boston appears to be the best fit for them.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    ...

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )
    ...
  2. ...

    There's only a few cities left that don't already have franchises that MAYBE could sustain a Major League club. Las Vegas (MLB may not even consider them due to the gambling environment just like the NBA and David Stern doesn't want to do), Portland (only the Trailblazers are in the area but they are relatively close to Seattle), Norfolk/Tidewater area (they have the population, but also not far from Washington or Baltimore), and Charlotte (already have the Bobcats and Panthers). If not Boston, as far as cities that could sustain another team, how about New York? Hasn't been that long ago they had the Giants, Dodgers, & Yankees and all of them competed year in and year out. IF the Marlins leave it would be interesting on just where they would end up.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    ...

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )
    ...
  3. ...

    The Marlins aren't leaving Florida. The stadium deal is as good as done. Maybe in 30 years? ;)

    Edit Comment Cancel

    ...

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )
    ...
  4. ...

    Wow. Great idea, but I don't see it happening. How would the Marlins ever build a fan base in Boston? Everybody there is pretty crazy about the Sox, I don't necessarily think that the Marlins could just waltz in and sell out. I'm not sure it's baseball that is so popular in Boston, I think it might just be the Red Sox and Fenway Park that draw the crowd. I like the idea, but I don't know where there they would draw fans from. I guess that there are some Sox fans who just like to go to games and don't care which team they root for. There also probably some that think the Sox are turning into the Yankees and they might support a new franchise. And I guess they might draw some Sox haters, but most of those would probably never root for any team from Boston.

    That would definitely create an interesting dynamic in the city though. I'd be willing to guess that the fans of the Boston Marlins (or Lobsters or whatever) would not get along with the fans of the Boston Red Sox and it would be the first time since the Braves were in Boston that the city was split.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    ...

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )
    ...

Leave a Comment

  • You must register to post a comment.

  • Want to write for Bleacher Report

    We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

    Learn More and Sign Up »



    Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
    Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.