GA vs. TN: The Silver Fox Forecast
It’s October and that time of year. Georgia vs. Tennessee. Autumn. Mostly sunshine, a little rain, and a couple of times: monsoons.
Did you know that Tennessee holds a 20-15-2 edge in the all-time series with Georgia, and that the Vols crushed the Bulldogs by a 35-14 final last season?
At 2-3, underachieving Tennessee is desperate for a victory and, therefore, represents a dangerous opponent for the Bulldogs. The Volunteers will play four of their final six regular season games at home following this weekend's game, and the level of competition is somewhat favorable. Obviously, head coach Phil Fulmer does not want to attempt to climb out of a 2-4 hole.
Tennessee’s offense had to play better in Athens. For the most part, the Vols have been tough defensively this season.
This game may become a classic strong offense vs. strong defense battle.
Did you know that Georgia is averaging 424.8 total yards per game this season? With the obvious exception of the first half of the Alabama game, the Bulldogs defense has played well, particularly against the run.
However, Georgia made critical mistakes against the Crimson Tide and must correct them for its contest against Tennessee.
As for Georgia, it opened the season with four consecutive victories before falling to Alabama two weeks ago. The Bulldogs have had two weeks to prepare for this weekend's game and hope to move to 2-1 in conference. They are playing their second of what will be three straight home games against league foes, as nationally-ranked Vanderbilt comes to town next weekend.
The Silver Fox Forecast: Georgia 27, Tennessee 23.
Quote of the Day:
What I hear, I forget. What I see, I remember. What I do, I understand.
|Proverbs 19:20-21“Listen to advice and accept instruction, and in the end you will be wise. Many are the plans in a man's heart, but it is the LORD's purpose that prevails.”
Brought to you by BibleGateway.com. Copyright (C) NIV. All Rights Reserved.
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE EDITING OR COMMENTING: Since some of my articles have been “butchered” by so-called “editors’ and because of some rude comments which have been flagged as offensive, the following information is presented. Some people may find these comments humorous, but the purpose is to hold editors accountable and members who leave comments accountable.
I welcome, encourage, and appreciate editing by other members of the Bleacher Report community that is done in a constructive manner. Editing is not revising. Editing is correction of errors in usage, grammar, and mechanics (sentence structure, tense, case, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, typos, etc.). Do not change or add to my tags for an article. Please make recommendations for revising an article by leaving a friendly note on my profile. Please do not revise any of my articles; do not rewrite or delete headlines, paragraphs, or sentences, or words; and do not change/replace or delete or photos.
Please write comments that are constructive or they will be flagged as offensive. My style of writing is terse and to the point. I don't beat around the bush. I don't practice what I characterize as "analysis paralysis." I typically like to cite facts and insert a little perspective here and there, but not everywhere because I want readers to make up their own minds. The purpose of my writings is to generate comments and analysis based on factual information. My blogging time is limited due to responsibilities in daily life away from the computer and the World Wide Web. Therefore, disparaging comments about an article’s short length or not having enough detailed analysis, are not constructive and will be flagged as offense.
I may also use the option of filing an allegation/claim/complaint with an email to TOU@bleacherreport.com and to Alexander Freund, Community Director, at email@example.com. On the other hand, if another member has done something on the network that I find noteworthy or deserving of commendation, I also have the option to contact Alexander Freund, Community Director, at firstname.lastname@example.org.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?